Skip to content

· Private foundation

Good People Dj Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Education$7kFood & Nutrition$6kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$2kHousing & Shelter$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$300
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,786
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
THE MILLSBORO HUT INC$1,500
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OAK ORCHARD$1,000
MILLSBORO LITTLE LEAGUE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
GEORGETOWN LITTLE LEAGUE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FIRST TEE - DELAWARE$1,000
THE SHEPHERDS HOUSE$450
TRG HELP FAMILY FIRE$300
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF OAK ORCHARD$265
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BJs Tent City: $4k → 10%Gabe Cannon: $3k → 10%ZOEY HARMON: $1k → 11%MACY MUMFORD: $3k → 10%FIRST TEE - DELAWARE: $1k → 10%THE MILLSBORO HUT INC: $2k → 10%UNIFIED SPORTS - SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $2k → 10%BJs Tent City: $1k → 10%LAYLA WEBSTER: $1k → 10%MILLSBORO LITTLE LEAGUE: $1k → 10%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OAK ORCHARD: $1k → 10%London Sturgis: $500 → 10%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF OAK ORCHARD: $265 → 10%GEORGETOWN LITTLE LEAGUE: $1k → 10%TRG HELP FAMILY FIRE: $300 → 10%THE SHEPHERDS HOUSE: $450 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2021 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $5,122 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMILLSBORO HUT INC: $1,500 · OtherMILLSBORO HUT INCMILLSBORO LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,000 · OtherFIRST TEE - DELAWARE: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OAK ORCHARD: $1,000 · Other+4 more: $1,515 · Other+4 more
Other$21,137

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILLSBORO LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILLSBORO LITTLE LEAGUE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Good People Dj Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Good People Dj Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY21–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Good People Dj Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Good People Dj Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Good People Dj’s filings →

    More from the funding graph