· Public charity
Golf Course Superintendents Association of America
Gcsaa is dedicated to serving its members, advancing their profession and improving communities through the enjoyment, growth and vitality of the game of golf.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $366,925 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $395,760 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,835 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $322k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GCSAA FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY | $82,479 |
| RUTGERS UNIVERSITY | $79,448 |
| WORLD GOLF FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY | $19,998 |
| WEE ONE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| GCSAA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GFGCSAA FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2024 · $360k · revenue +9%
Oregon State University Foundation3× · 2019–2022 · $110k · revenue +38%- WOWEE ONE FOUNDATION INC6× · 2019–2024 · $86k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEEone grant, 2023 · $96k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $38k · revenue +98%
- PSPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $32k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To preserve, promote, and serve the game of golf
The association has been formed and exists for the purpose of promoting and conserving the best interests and the true spirit of the game of golf as embodied in its ancient and honorable traditions.
To represent the interests of its members in obtaining news in the world of golf and improving their working conditions.
The purpose of the association shall be to promote turf management as it pertains to the golf course superintendent and to unify the golf course superintendents of the state of Florida
The carolinas gcsa is committed to providing its members the opportunity to excel professionally and enhance the game of golf through responsible turfgrass management.
Promotion of game/rules of golf throughout the state of georgia
To support and promote the game of golf in southern nevada, our mission is to grow participation, provide excellent service, and demonstrate passion in the game of golf while upholding the integrity and traditions of the game.
The purpose of this association shall be to promote turf management as it pertains to the golf course superintendent.
The organization is dedicated to enhancing the professional recognition of its members through education, leadership, collaboration, government relations and environmental stewardship.
Support and promotion of amature golf
The cga is a non-profit service organization that was formed in 1909 to conduct championships and tournaments for amateur golfers in north and south carolina, administer the usga handicap system in the carolinas, and support its membership…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Golf Course Superintendents Association of New Jersey and the most unlike its peers is Oregon State University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WORLD GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GCSAA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds WEE ONE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH NEVADA GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENT ASSOC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
- Who funds HEART OF AMERICA GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Philadelphia Asc of Golf Course Superintendents ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds IDAHO GCSA ↗
- Who funds Eastern Shore Association of Golf Course Superintendents Inc ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENT ASSOCIATI ↗
- Who funds OREGON GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOC ↗
- Who funds Hawaii Golf Course SuperIntendents Association ↗
- Who funds NORTH CENTRAL TURF GRASS ASSOC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MTN GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GOLF COURSE SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: United States Golf Association
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Golf Course Superintendents Association of America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Golf Course Superintendents Association of America?
Find your warmest path to Golf Course Superintendents Association of America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.