· Private foundation
Goldner Family Charity Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k40 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONG LZCHUS AVOS INC | $36,000 |
| MISC CHARITIES | $8,606 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,203 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,997 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,320 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| CONG BAIS YISROEL YEHOSHUA | $1,750 |
| RAV CHESED | $1,470 |
| YESHIVA EMEK HATORAH | $1,100 |
| FIRST CONG ANSHE SFARD | $1,000 |
| ICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH | $1,000 |
| YESHIVA TIFERES YAAKOV YITZCHOK | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $760) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
65 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TFTZUR FOUNDATION INC6× · 2019–2024 · $83k · revenue +149%
- KCKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +0%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAAS AHARON INC3× · 2019–2023 · $3k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- YOYESHIVA OHR MOLEH KASONone grant, 2018 · $50k
- NSNVEH SHALOMone grant, 2018 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
How this is measured
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 158 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ackerman Family Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Basch Family Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Zelig and Sarah Grossman Foundation · Md Friedman Family Foundation · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Fishoff Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Goldner Family Charity Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goldner Family Charity Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
- Mesivta Nezer Hatorah: 7% of income from government
- Meiras Bais Yaakov Inc: 7% of income from government
- Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Goldner Family Charity’s filings →