Skip to content

· Private foundation

Goldberg Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$3.9MArts & Culture$1.1MFood & Nutrition$615kHuman Services$329kEducation$329kAnimals$308kScience & Tech$183kSocial Science$171k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$362
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$1,449
UM SYLVESTOR COMP CANCER CENTER$725
MAYO CLINIC$724
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTR$724
FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA$724
MORSE LIFE FOUNDATION$362
HARVARD LAW SCHOOL$362
MIAMI MUSIC PROJECT$362
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI PROJECT NEWBORN$362
HUMANE SOCIETY OF TREASURE COAST$362
LEONARD M MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$362
UM FROST SCHOOL OF MUSIC$362
UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA WHARTON SCHOOL$362
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $329k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MORSE LIFE FOUNDATION: $183k → 11%MORSE LIFE FOUNDATION: $105k → 11%MORSELIFE FOUNDATION: $21k → 11%MORSE LIFE FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%MORSE LIFE FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%MORSE LIFE FOUNDATION: $362 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 14 repeat orgs$598k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$5.5M
$598k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+279%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +109%
  • MF
    MORSELIFE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $329k · revenue +19%
  • MM
    MIAMI MUSIC PROJECT INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $308k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • RF
    RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $450k · revenue +279%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $60k · revenue +112%
  • MI
    MORSELIFE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc

JMCPG is committed to providing compassionate, personalized care from the region's most trusted team of physicians and health care professionals. Across the Palm Beaches and the Treasure Coast of Florida, JMCPG practice locations offer…

Health
2
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
3
The Mount Sinai Medical Center

Provide fundraising, support, and maintains pooled investments for entities of the mount sinai health system, inc.

Health
4
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
12
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jupiter Medical Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Miami Music Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UM SYLVESTOR COMP CANCER CENTER: $601,225 · OtherUM SYLVESTOR COMP CANCER CENTERLEONARD M MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $307,615 · OtherLEONARD M MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICIN…UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI PROJECT NEWBORN: $300,612 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI PROJECT NEWBOR…UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA WHARTON SCHOOL: $300,612 · OtherUNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA WHARTON SCHOO…UM FROST SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $300,612 · OtherUM FROST SCHOOL OF MUSICHARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $171,115 · OtherHARVARD LAW SCHOOL+8 more: $166,023 · Other+8 moreMAYO CLINIC: $686,231 · HealthMAYO CLINICMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $601,224 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTER…Jupiter Medical Center Inc: $60,000 · HealthJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $1,285,462 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Cent…RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $450,000 · Arts & CultureRAYMOND F KR…MIAMI MUSIC PROJECT INC: $307,615 · Arts & CultureMIAMI MUSIC …FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $615,231 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SO…MORSELIFE FOUNDATION INC: $328,616 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST INC: $307,615 · AnimalsPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $182,500 · Education
Other$2,147,814Health$1,347,455Philanthropy$1,285,462Arts & Culture$757,615Food & Nutrition$615,231Human Services$328,616Animals$307,615Education$182,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $1,285,462 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $686,231 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $615,231 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $601,224 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $450,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetMORSELIFE FOUNDATION INC: $328,616 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetMIAMI MUSIC PROJECT INC: $307,615 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST INC: $307,615 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $182,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MORSELIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI MUSIC PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goldberg Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goldberg Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Miami Music Project Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Goldberg Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Goldberg Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goldberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph