Skip to content

· Private foundation

Global Heartcare Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$351k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$215kEducation$193k
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $278k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$13,800
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KILIMANJARO CHRISTIAN MEDICAL CENTER$51,876
CARDIA CENTER OF ETHIOPIA & ST PAUL MILLENNIUM MEDICAL COLLEGE$48,317
THE CHILDREN'S HEART FUND OF ETHIOPIA$43,152
Individual grant recipient$20,500
Individual grant recipient$20,500
RHD TRAINING CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE$16,023
Individual grant recipient$15,800
Individual grant recipient$14,120
Individual grant recipient$14,100
Individual grant recipient$13,800
Individual grant recipient$12,850
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
02The need
03

Where the grant dollars land

Across the US and around the world.

US giving: 0% of grant dollars ($0). The 100% that went abroad ($408k) is mapped below.

Beyond the US: 100% of all-years giving ($408k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Tanzania$148k · 8 grants
Ethiopia$131k · 5 grants
India$130k · 14 grants
How this is measured
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122k · 6 repeat orgs$286k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$122k
$16k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $270k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HEART FUND OF ETHIOPIA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k
  • KC
    KILIMANJARO CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k

Funded once

  • AA
    ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY- COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES
    one grant, 2024 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2023 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KILIMANJARO CHRISTIAN MEDICAL CENTER: $51,876 · OtherKILIMANJARO CHRISTIAN MEDICAL CENTERTHE CHILDREN'S HEART FUND OF ETHIOPIA: $50,469 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S HEART FUND OF ETHIOPIACARDIA CENTER OF ETHIOPIA & ST PAUL MILLENNIUM MEDICAL COLLEGE: $48,317 · OtherCARDIA CENTER OF ETHIOPIA & ST PAUL MILLENNIUM MEDICAL COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $20,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,500 · OtherKILIMANJARO CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $17,898 · OtherRHD TRAINING CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE: $16,023 · OtherADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY- COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $16,023 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,120 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,100 · Other+8 more: $93,195 · Other+8 more
Other$408,221

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Global Heartcare’s filings →

More from the funding graph