Skip to content
Glenn & Stacey Eisenberg Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Glenn & Stacey Eisenberg Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$135kHuman Services$96kFood & Nutrition$80kHealth$50kEducation$32kAnimals$19kArts & Culture$11kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$863k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CHARLOTTE$20,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$12,908
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$12,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADO$5,000
TULANE UNIVERSITY$3,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC$2,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHARLOTTE$2,000
DANIEL STOWE BOTANICAL GARDEN$1,000
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 15% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADO: $5k → 17%Friendship Circle of West Bloomfield: $6k → 8%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $5k → 18%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $5k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $13k → 10%DUKE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 11%Alamance Regional Charitable Foundation: $5k → 13%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 23%AFMDA: $5k → 17%Planned Parenthood South Atlantic: $5k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $11k → 10%Alamance Regional Charitable Foundation: $5k → 13%Tulane University: $5k → 23%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $5k → 8%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $10k → 10%ALAMANCE REGIONAL CHARITA: $5k → 13%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 23%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $5k → 8%Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina: $10k → 10%ALAMANCE REGIONAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 23%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $10k → 10%ALAMANCE REGIONAL CHARITA: $5k → 13%Tulane University: $3k → 23%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $10k → 10%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 23%Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina: $8k → 10%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 23%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF METROLINA: $8k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHARLOTTE: $3k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHARLOTTE: $4k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CHARLOTTE: $20k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CHARLOTTE: $20k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CHARLOTTE: $20k → 10%UNITED JEWISH CHARITIES OF GREATER: $20k → 10%UNITED JEWISH CHARITIES OF GREATER: $20k → 10%United Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte: $15k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $12k → 10%UNITED JEWISH CHARITIES OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $10k → 10%Jewish Family Services: $10k → 10%United Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte: $10k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 10%Jewish Family Services: $10k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
NC
LA
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$437k · 15 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$437k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+23%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    United Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc
    5× · 2018–2022 · $75k · revenue +154%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +49%
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    8× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +23%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • DP
    Discovery Place Charlotte
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Unc Health Foundation Inc

At unc health foundation, we inspire philanthropic support for unc health and unc school of medicine that transforms healthcare and provides hope to the people of north carolina and communities around the world.

Education
2
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
5
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
University of Maryland Obstetrical Andgynecological Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
12
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia State University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $89,500 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESJEWISH FEDERATION OF CHARLOTTE: $60,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF CHARLOTTESECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $54,012 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKCONE HEALTH PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherCONE HEALTH PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATIONFriendship Circle of West Bloomfield: $10,500 · OtherALAMANCE REGIONAL CHARITA: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $13,149 · OtherUnited Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc: $75,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Jewish Char…THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $28,500 · EducationGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $2,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,500 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $28,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · HealthSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $25,500 · Food & NutritionHumane Society of Charlotte Inc: $18,500 · AnimalsAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 · InternationalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$252,161Philanthropy$75,000Education$32,000Health$29,500Food & Nutrition$25,500Animals$18,500International$10,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc: $75,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $28,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $28,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $25,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Charlotte Inc: $18,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCONE HEALTH PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONE HEALTH PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glenn & Stacey Eisenberg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glenn & Stacey Eisenberg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Glenn & Stacey Eisenberg Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home