Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Arkansas · Private foundation

Glen Conklin Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$62k
Granted FY2019
7
Itemized grants FY2019
7
Organizations funded FY2019
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2019
$56k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2019
$3,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$30,000
States reached, FY2019
1
Total assets, FY2019
$779k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$256kYouth Development$30kEducation$15kHealth$5kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Magdalene Serenity House Inc$3,00011%
Welcomehealth$2,00010%

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($51k), not named here.

Compare Glen Conklin Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About Glen Conklin Charitable Foundation

How much does Glen Conklin Charitable Foundation give?
Glen Conklin Charitable Foundation reported 7 itemized grants totaling $55,615, out of $61,615 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2019 IRS filing.
What does Glen Conklin Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2019, its largest causes are Human Services (81%), Youth Development (10%), Education (5%).
Who are Glen Conklin Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2019: Magdalene Serenity House Inc ($3k), Welcomehealth ($2k).
Does Glen Conklin Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is Glen Conklin Charitable Foundation based?
Glen Conklin Charitable Foundation is based in AR.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $56k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Glen Conklin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home