Skip to content

· Private foundation

GleicherChen Family Foundation co Damon Chen Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$219k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Radiant Health Centers$100,000
Chabad Center for Jewish Life$35,000
Skirball Cultural Center$25,000
Apla Health$25,000
Center Theater Group$8,000
Simon Wiesenthal Center$6,000
City Year Inc$5,000
Kaleidoscope Child Foundation$5,000
Segerstrom Center$5,000
Jewish Federation of OC$1,750
American Film Institute$1,000
Crohns Colitis Foundation$1,000
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Fndn$880
Irvine Barclay Theater$500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 24% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Fndn: $880 → 7%Segerstrom Center: $5k → 10%American Film Institute: $1k → 14%Crohns Colitis Foundation: $1k → 17%Kaleidoscope Child Foundation: $5k → 14%Chabad Center for Jewish Life: $35k → 10%Center Theater Group: $8k → 14%Radiant Health Centers: $100k → 10%Simon Wiesenthal Center: $6k → 14%Radiant Health Centers: $100k → 10%Skirball Cultural Center: $25k → 14%Jewish Federation of OC: $2k → 10%Apla Health: $25k → 14%Irvine Barclay Theater: $500 → 10%City Year Inc: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
1/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AIDS Services Foundation Orange County: $200,000 · OtherAIDS Services Foundation Orange CountyCHABAD CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE: $35,000 · OtherCHABAD CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFEApla Health: $25,000 · OtherApla Health+6 more: $21,250 · Other+6 moreSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CU…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESE…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureKALEIDOSCOPE CHILD FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $880 · Health
Other$281,250Arts & Culture$32,000Education$5,000Health$880

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAIDS Services Foundation Orange County: $200,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKALEIDOSCOPE CHILD FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $880 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization GleicherChen Family Foundation co Damon Chen Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from GleicherChen Family Foundation co Damon Chen Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on GleicherChen Family Foundation co Damon Chen Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph