Skip to content

· Private foundation

Glassman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$705k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$705k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.6MReligion$19kInternational$6kArts & Culture$2kHuman Services$2kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$704,655
Median grant
1
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Various Public Charities$704,655
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 6 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +251% since the first grant, against +71% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
21

Total granted

$1.6M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+251%
+71%

Still filing today

33%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VP
    Various Public Charities
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M
  • R
    RCCS
    3× · 2018–2020 · $5k
  • L
    Lutzk
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k

Funded once

  • AF
    American Friends of Daas Ahron
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • LR
    Lev Rachel Bikur Cholim
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • TF
    TZUR FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +149%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
2
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
5
Zichron Yaakov Yitzchok Inc
—
6
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
7
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
8
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
9
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
10
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
11
Zichroin Rabbeini Meshilem Feiish Ztl Foundation
—
12
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bais Yaakov Ateres Miriam; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Center of Ulyanovsk Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Various Public Charities: $1,585,926 · OtherVarious Public Charities+19 more: $27,339 · OtherTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $2,200 · ReligionJEWISH CENTER OF ULYANOVSK INC: $1,500 · ReligionMISASKIM CORP: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHAI 4EVER INC: $626 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $500 · Human ServicesBAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM: $1,800 · EducationSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $610 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,613,265Religion$3,700Human Services$2,126Education$1,800Food & Nutrition$610

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH CENTER OF ULYANOVSK INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI 4EVER INC: $626 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $610 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF TOLDOS TZVI INC: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH CENTER OF ULYANOVSK INC ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
  • Who funds CHAI 4EVER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TOLDOS TZVI INC ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Glassman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph