Skip to content
Gf & Jh Fleming Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Gf & Jh Fleming Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$127kHuman Services$108kReligion$81kPublic Safety & Disaster$43kEducation$32kPhilanthropy$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$3,571
Median grant
5
States reached
$982k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSOC CHARITIES OF TITUSVILLE$14,285
TITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER$9,524
ST TITUS CHURCH$9,524
AMERICAN RED CROSS$4,762
BENSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY INC$3,571
Individual grant recipient$1,190
MARCH OF DIMES FOUNDATION$1,190
THE ARC OF CRAWFORD COUNTY INC$1,190
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,190
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,190
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$413k · 14 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$413k
$9k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF TITUSVILLE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $101k · revenue +161%
  • TA
    TITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $54k · revenue +323%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • SW
    ST WALBURGA CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • ST
    ST TITUS ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
2
American College of Rheumatology Inc

The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…

—
3
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
4
Arkansas Methodist Hospital Corporation D/B/a Arkansas Methodist Medical Center

During fiscal year 2025, ammc discharged 3,101 adult and pediatric inpatients and delivered 394 newborns. there were approximately 92,000 outpatient visits ranging from outpatient surgery and cardiac cath lab procedures to diagnostic…

Health
5
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
6
American College of Radiology Association

The purpose of the association is the promotion of educational and professional association interests including but not limited to the promotion of the interests of radiology and the interests and study of the socioeconomic aspects of the…

Community Improvement
7
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
8
Adult Congenital Heart Association

To empower the congenital heart disease (chd) community by advancing access to resources and specialized care that improve patient-centered outcomes.

Health
9
Mclaren Macomb

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
10
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
11
Riverside Medical Center

Riverside medical center is committed to improving the well-being of the communities it serves, regardless of an individual's ability to pay. in addition to the day-to-day services provided to patients, riverside medical center reaches…

Health
12
American College of Cardiology

To transform cardiovascular care and improve heart health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Benson Memorial Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF TITUSVILLE: $100,581 · OtherASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF TITUSVILLEST TITUS CHURCH: $71,953 · OtherST TITUS CHURCHTITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $54,184 · OtherTITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATIONBENSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $32,157 · OtherBENSON MEMORIAL LIBRARYTITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER INC: $30,050 · OtherTITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER INCASSOCIATED CHARITIES: $28,049 · OtherASSOCIATED CHARITIES+6 more: $37,856 · Other+6 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $42,877 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,720 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,720 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,756 · Health
Other$354,830Human Services$42,877Health$25,196

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF TITUSVILLE: $100,581 over 7y, 11% of budgetTITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $54,184 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $42,877 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBENSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $32,157 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,720 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe ARC of Crawford County Inc: $10,720 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,720 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,756 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF TITUSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds TITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BENSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds The ARC of Crawford County Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Mitchell R Tw for Cha…
Mitchell R Tw for CharitiesPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mitchell R Tw for Charities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gf & Jh Fleming Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gf & Jh Fleming Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gf & Jh Fleming’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home