Skip to content
Geraldine Tase Charitable Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Geraldine Tase Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$87kReligion$45kArts & Culture$29kPhilanthropy$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$617k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$4,800
STURGIS AREA COMMUNITY FDN$4,800
Individual grant recipient$4,800
THREE RIVERS PUBLIC LIBRARY$4,800
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$4,800
CARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS$4,800
THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$4,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Western MI Univ Foundation: $9k → 12%Carnegie Ctr for the Arts: $9k → 13%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%Three Rivers Comm Schools: $9k → 13%Western MI Univ Foundation: $4k → 12%Three Rivers Area Foundation: $9k → 13%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%St Gregory's Abbey: $9k → 13%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%Three Rivers Public Library: $9k → 13%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%Trinity Church of Three Rivers: $9k → 13%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%CARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS: $5k → 13%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 13%THREE RIVERS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $5k → 13%SAINT GREGORY'S ABBEY: $5k → 13%THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $5k → 13%St Gregory's Abbey: $4k → 13%Trinity Church of Three Rivers: $4k → 13%Three Rivers Public Library: $4k → 13%Three Rivers Comm Schools: $4k → 13%Carnegie Ctr for the Arts: $4k → 13%Three Rivers Area Foundation: $4k → 13%THREE RIVERS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 13%THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $3k → 13%ST GREGORY'S ABBEY: $3k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%TRINITY CHURCH OF THREE RIVERS: $3k → 13%CARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS INC: $3k → 13%CARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS: $3k → 13%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $3k → 13%THREE RIVERS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 13%SAINT GREGORY'S ABBEY: $3k → 13%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3k → 13%THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $3k → 13%CARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS: $3k → 13%THREE RIVERS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 13%THREE RIVERS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%SAINT GREGORY'S ABBEY: $3k → 13%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3k → 13%THREE RIVERS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 13%SAINT GREGORY'S ABBEY: $3k → 13%THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $3k → 13%CARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS: $3k → 13%STURGIS AREA COMMUNITY FDN: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$187k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$187k
$0

Still filing today

18%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    Three Rivers Public Library
    7× · 2019–2025 · $29k
  • CC
    CARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART
    7× · 2019–2025 · $29k · revenue -29%
  • TR
    THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $17k

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    4/4
    Grantees still filing
    0/4
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Three Rivers Public Library: $29,083 · OtherThree Rivers Public LibraryCARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART: $29,083 · OtherCARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ARTTHREE RIVERS COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $16,514 · OtherTHREE RIVERS COMMUNITY SCHOOLSTrinity Church of Three Rivers: $15,998 · OtherTrinity Church of Three RiversST GREGORY'S ABBEY: $15,998 · OtherST GREGORY'S ABBEYIndividual grant recipient: $13,085 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $13,085 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCHThree Rivers Area Foundation: $12,569 · OtherThree Rivers Area FoundationThree Rivers Comm Schools: $12,569 · OtherThree Rivers Comm SchoolsWestern MI Univ Foundation: $12,569 · OtherWestern MI Univ FoundationTHREE RIVERS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,714 · OtherTHREE RIVERS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,514 · EducationWESTERN M…STURGIS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,800 · Philanthropy
    Other$182,267Education$16,514Philanthropy$4,800

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART: $29,083 over 7y, 6.4% of budgetWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,514 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE RIVERS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,714 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSTURGIS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CARNEGIE CENTER COUNCIL FOR THE ART ↗
    • Who funds WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds THREE RIVERS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds STURGIS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Geraldine Tase Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Geraldine Tase Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Geraldine Tase Charitable Tr’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home