Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Georgia Youth Science and Tech Cent

Promote interest and enthusiasm in science and the technologies, particularly among elementary and middle school teachers and youth in the state of georgia

$545k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$2.6MScience & Tech$355k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $475,193 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $545,053 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $69,860 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $270k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $205k
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$836k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABRAHAM BALDWIN AGRICULTURAL COLLEG$110,780
CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY$94,413
CHATTAHOOCHEE FLINT CTR$45,000
SOUTHWEST GA YSTC$45,000
ETOWAH CENTER$45,000
MAGNOLIA MIDLANDS CTR$45,000
WEST GA CTR$45,000
OCONEE RIVER CTR$45,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 40% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%OCONEE RIVER CTR: $45k → 13%GORDON GYSTC: $52k → 13%WEST GA CTR: $45k → 13%ETOWAH CENTER: $45k → 15%CHATTAHOOCHEE FLINT CTR: $47k → 15%ABRAHAM BALDWIN AGRICULTURAL COLLEG: $111k → 17%MAGNOLIA MIDLANDS CTR: $45k → 21%CHATTAHOOCHEE FLINT CTR: $45k → 22%CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $94k → 23%SOUTHWEST GA YSTC: $49k → 23%OCONEE RIVER CTR: $45k → 13%GORDON GYSTC: $45k → 13%WEST GA CTR: $45k → 13%ETOWAH CENTER: $45k → 15%CHATTAHOOCHEE FLINT CTR: $45k → 15%ABRAHAM BALDWIN AGRICULTURAL COLLEG: $40k → 17%MAGNOLIA MIDLANDS CTR: $45k → 21%CHATTAHOOCHEE FLINT CTR: $40k → 22%CENTRAL GYSTC: $40k → 23%SOUTHWEST GA YSTC: $45k → 23%OCONEE RIVER CTR: $41k → 13%GORDON GYSTC: $42k → 13%WEST GA CTR: $42k → 13%ETOWAH CENTER: $41k → 15%CHATTAHOOCHEE FLINT CTR: $41k → 15%MAGNOLIA MIDLANDS CTR: $45k → 21%CHATTAHOOCHEE FLINT CTR: $40k → 22%SOUTHWEST GA YSTC: $45k → 23%OCONEE RIVER CTR: $40k → 13%GORDON GYSTC: $40k → 13%WEST GA CTR: $41k → 13%ETOWAH CENTER: $40k → 15%MAGNOLIA MIDLANDS CTR: $42k → 21%CHATTAHOOCHEE FLINT CTR: $40k → 22%SOUTHWEST GA YSTC: $41k → 23%OCONEE RIVER CTR: $40k → 13%GORDON GYSTC: $40k → 13%WEST GA CTR: $40k → 13%ETOWAH CENTER: $40k → 15%MAGNOLIA MIDLANDS CTR: $41k → 21%SOUTHWEST GA YSTC: $40k → 23%OCONEE RIVER CTR: $40k → 13%GORDON GYSTC: $40k → 13%WEST GA CTR: $40k → 13%ETOWAH CENTER: $40k → 15%MAGNOLIA MIDLANDS CTR: $40k → 21%SOUTHWEST GA YSTC: $40k → 23%GORDON GYSTC: $40k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$2.9M
$0

Still filing today

90%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MAGNOLIA MIDLANDS GYSTC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $375k · revenue +27% · 64% of their budget
  • WG
    West Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $366k · revenue +91% · 37% of their budget
  • SG
    SOUTHWEST GA YOUTH SCIENCE & TECHNO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $365k · revenue +56% · 85% of their budget

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Girls in Stem
    Human Services
    2
    Georgia Science Olympiad Inc

    To expose students K-12 to all aspects of a STEM education beyond what they receive in the regular education setting. Allows students to explore various areas of STEM while preparing them for the rigors of a career in the STEM field.

    Education
    3
    Stem for Development
    Education
    4
    Connecting Stem Kids With the Future Inc
    5
    Georgia Youth Science and Tech Cent

    Promote interest and enthusiasm in science and the technologies, particularly among elementary and middle school teachers and youth in the state of georgia

    6
    Georgia Accelerated Career Academy Inc

    Public Charter School

    Education
    7
    Stem Gems Inc

    STEM Gems is a 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to building a stronger, more inclusive STEM pipeline by empowering girls and young women of all backgrounds to explore, pursue, and excel in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM).…

    Youth Development
    8
    Tennessee Geographic Alliance

    Education

    Education
    9
    Spartanburg Science Center

    To provide science enrichment and interactive educational programs and exhibits to supplement and enhance the science education of children and adults of spartanburg county sc.

    10
    St Marys County Public Schools Science Technology Engineering & M

    Support of SMCPS STEM educational programs

    Education
    11
    North Carolina Science Teachers Association

    The advancement, stimulation, extension, improvement and coordination of science teaching in all fields of science at all educational levels.

    12
    Advanced Technology Education Llc

    Increase the stdent skills

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oconee River Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Corporation of Mercer University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    7
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    MAGNOLIA MIDLANDS GYSTC — $374,565 · OtherMAGNOLIA MIDLANDS GYSTCWest Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center — $366,200 · OtherWest Georgia Youth Science and Technology CenterSOUTHWEST GA YOUTH SCIENCE & TECHNO — $365,423 · OtherSOUTHWEST GA YOUTH SCIENCE & TECHNOOconee River Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center Inc — $360,062 · OtherOconee River Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center IncEtowah Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center — $354,950 · OtherEtowah Georgia Youth Science and Technology CenterCHATTAHOOCHEE-FLINT GYSTC — $348,400 · OtherCHATTAHOOCHEE-FLINT GYSTCGORDON GEORGIA YOUTH SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC — $338,565 · OtherGORDON GEORGIA YOUTH SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CENTER INCCENTRAL GYSTC — $111,750 · OtherAbraham Baldwin Agricultural College Foundation Inc — $160,682 · EducationAbraham Bald…THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY — $156,995 · EducationTHE CORPORAT…
    Other$2,619,915Education$317,677

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAGNOLIA MIDLANDS GYSTC — $374,565 over 9y, 64% of budgetWest Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center — $366,200 over 9y, 37% of budgetSOUTHWEST GA YOUTH SCIENCE & TECHNO — $365,423 over 9y, 85% of budgetOconee River Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center Inc — $360,062 over 9y, 30% of budgetEtowah Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center — $354,950 over 9y, 48% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE-FLINT GYSTC — $348,400 over 9y, 72% of budgetGORDON GEORGIA YOUTH SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC — $338,565 over 9y, 100% of budgetAbraham Baldwin Agricultural College Foundation Inc — $160,682 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY — $156,995 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds MAGNOLIA MIDLANDS GYSTC
    • Who funds West Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center
    • Who funds SOUTHWEST GA YOUTH SCIENCE & TECHNO
    • Who funds Oconee River Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center Inc
    • Who funds Etowah Georgia Youth Science and Technology Center
    • Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE-FLINT GYSTC
    • Who funds GORDON GEORGIA YOUTH SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC
    • Who funds Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College Foundation Inc
    • Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Georgia Youth Science and Tech Cent funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph