Skip to content

· Public charity

Georgia Association of Conservation Districts Inc

Advocating for the conservation of Georgias natural resources by providing organization, leadership and a unified strategic direction to the soil and water conservation districts of the state.

$415k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Environment$833kAnimals$65kEducation$43kFood & Nutrition$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$28k
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $395k
$17,550
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGIA FOUNDATION FOR AGRICU$28,250
WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS$24,771
APPLING BOARD OF COMMISSIONER$24,500
WILKES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS$23,000
MORGAN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS$22,700
NEWTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS$22,300
GWINETT COUNTY SOIL & WATER C$21,000
RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF COMM$20,000
JENKINS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI$18,424
WALTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS$18,190
TELFAIR COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI$18,000
FLINT RIVER SOIL & WATER CONS$17,550
BRIER CREEK SOIL & WATER CONS$17,400
EARLY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS$17,000
MITCHELL COUNTY BOARD OF COMM$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 20%GWINETT COUNTY SOIL & WATER C: $21k → 9%jager pro llc: $26k → 9%UNION COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: $24k → 10%MORGAN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $23k → 11%DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSI: $16k → 11%WALTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $18k → 11%NEWTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $22k → 12%GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPO: $25k → 13%LAMAR COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS: $14k → 13%NRCW-ABAC: $16k → 17%SOUTHERN HOG CONTROL LLC: $9k → 18%WEBSTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI: $16k → 18%RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF COMM: $20k → 18%WILKES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $23k → 19%SUPER-SOD: $16k → 19%PULASKI COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI: $25k → 20%APPLING BOARD OF COMMISSIONER: $25k → 20%GEORGIA FFA FOUNDATION: $11k → 21%WORTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS: $35k → 22%TAYLOR COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $18k → 23%FLINT RIVER SOIL & WATER CONS: $27k → 23%EARLY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS: $17k → 24%RANDOLPH COUNTY BOARD OF COMM: $12k → 27%JENKINS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI: $19k → 28%TELFAIR COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI: $18k → 31%JAGER PRO LLC: $13k → 9%MORGAN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $21k → 11%DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSI: $16k → 11%WALTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $18k → 11%NEWTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $21k → 12%LAMAR COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS: $12k → 13%NRCW-ABAC: $11k → 17%WEBSTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI: $16k → 18%RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF COMM: $19k → 18%WILKES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $22k → 19%PULASKI COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI: $16k → 20%APPLING BOARD OF COMMISSIONER: $25k → 20%FLINT RIVER SOIL & WATER CONS: $18k → 23%EARLY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS: $17k → 24%RANDOLPH COUNTY BOARD OF COMM: $12k → 27%JENKINS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI: $18k → 28%TELFAIR COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI: $18k → 31%JAGER PRO LLC: $10k → 9%NRCW-ABAC: $10k → 17%MITCHELL COUNTY BOARD OF COMM: $17k → 23%BRIER CREEK SOIL & WATER CONS: $17k → 28%MITCHELL COUNTY BOARD OF COMM: $9k → 23%BRIER CREEK SOIL & WATER CONS: $15k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$822k · 22 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
8

Total granted

$822k
$141k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k
  • AB
    APPLING BOARD OF COMMISSIONER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $49k
  • GF
    GEORGIA FOUNDATION FOR AGRICU
    2× · 2021–2024 · $48k

Funded once

  • WC
    WORTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • GD
    GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPO
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • UC
    UNION COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
    one grant, 2023 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS: $49,567 · OtherAPPLING BOARD OF COMMISSIONER: $49,000 · OtherGEORGIA FOUNDATION FOR AGRICU: $48,250 · Otherjager pro llc: $48,149 · OtherWILKES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $44,540 · OtherFLINT RIVER SOIL & WATER CONS: $44,220 · OtherMORGAN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $43,930 · OtherNEWTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $42,978 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $42,500 · OtherPULASKI COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI: $41,475 · OtherRICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF COMM: $38,720 · OtherJENKINS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI: $37,872 · OtherTELFAIR COUNTY BOARD OF COMMI: $36,000 · OtherWALTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMIS: $35,729 · OtherWORTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS: $35,346 · OtherEARLY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISS: $34,000 · Other+17 more: $328,124 · Other+17 more
Other$1,000,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGIA FFA FOUNDATION INC: $11,250 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGIA FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Georgia Association of Conservation Districts Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Georgia Association of Conservation Districts Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Georgia Association of Conservation Districts’ filings →

    More from the funding graph