Skip to content

· Private foundation

George William Patton Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$599k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$1.5MReligion$860kYouth Development$688kEducation$432kRecreation & Sports$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $579k
$12,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - LAKE CITY$82,759
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$82,759
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$82,759
MARCH OF DIMES INC$82,759
FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$82,759
CARNEGIE-TYRON PUBLIC LIBRARY$82,759
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PASADENA$82,759
WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES$12,000
LAKE CITY MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT$2,000
CAMP FIRE USA - MINNESOTA COUNCIL$1,000
BOY SCOUTS OF LAKE CITY MN$1,000
BOYS' REPUBLIC OF CHINO$1,000
LAKE CITY MINNESOTA HARBOR$1,000
LOCAL CHURCH MINISTRIES$1,000
WIDER CHURCH MINISTRIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CARNEGIE-TYRON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $98k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PASADENA: $95k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES -: $79k → 9%WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $12k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $95k → 16%YMCA - YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $95k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES INC: $95k → 7%FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $95k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PASADENA: $88k → 14%WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $2k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $88k → 16%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $88k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES INC: $88k → 7%MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - LAKE CITY: $95k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PASADENA: $83k → 14%WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $2k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $83k → 16%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $83k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES INC: $83k → 7%CARNEGIE-TYRON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $91k → 8%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF: $79k → 14%WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $2k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $79k → 16%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN: $79k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES INC: $78k → 7%FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $88k → 8%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PASADENA: $78k → 14%WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $2k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $78k → 16%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $78k → 14%MARCH OF DIMES INC: $77k → 7%MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - LAKE CITY: $88k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PASADENA: $77k → 14%WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: $2k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $77k → 16%YMCA - YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $77k → 14%MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - LAKE CITY: $83k → 8%FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $83k → 8%CARNEGIE-TYRON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $83k → 8%CARNEGIE-TYRON PUBLIC: $82k → 8%CARNEGIE-TYRON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $81k → 8%CARNEGIE-TYRON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $80k → 8%MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM -: $79k → 8%FIRST CONGREGATIONAL: $79k → 8%FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $78k → 8%MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - LAKE CITY: $78k → 8%FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $77k → 8%MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - LAKE CITY: $77k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 14 repeat orgs$401k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$3.2M
$398k

Still filing today

21%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $499k
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $499k · revenue -35%
  • CP
    CARNEGIE-TYRON PUBLIC LIBRARY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $432k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $82k
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM
    one grant, 2019 · $79k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF
    one grant, 2019 · $79k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $499,083 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCCARNEGIE-TYRON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $432,368 · OtherCARNEGIE-TYRON PUBLIC LIBRARYMAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - LAKE CITY: $420,368 · OtherMAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM - LAKE CITYFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $420,368 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $248,551 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONYMCA - YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $171,817 · OtherYMCA - YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION+13 more: $446,575 · Other+13 moreMARCH OF DIMES INC: $499,083 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES …BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA: $420,368 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS …+1 more: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,639,130Health$499,083Youth Development$425,368

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $499,083 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA: $420,368 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetCAMP FIRE MINNESOTA: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE MINNESOTA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George William Patton Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George William Patton Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George William Patton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph