Skip to content

· Private foundation

George M Baldwin Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Philanthropy$1.2MYouth Development$800kHousing & Shelter$475kHealth$175kRecreation & Sports$75kArts & Culture$60kHuman Services$55kEducation$30k
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+2 grants · $700k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST FL$400,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF NE FL$300,000
SULZBACHER HOMELESS CENTER$150,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF GATEWAY COUNCIL$50,000
SALVATION ARMY$25,000
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$25,000
ST VINCENTS FOUNDATION$25,000
YMCA OF FL FIRST COAST$25,000
CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT$20,000
FLORIDA FISH WILDLIFE CONSERVATION$15,000
COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$2.9M
$0

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
PhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    Girl Scouts of Gateway Council Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +18%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT'S FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $75k · revenue +500%
  • CA
    CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +80%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    5/5
    Grantees still filing
    3/5
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF NE FL: $600,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF NE FLSULZBACHER HOMELESS CENTER: $450,000 · OtherSULZBACHER HOMELESS CENTERSALVATION ARMY: $75,000 · OtherYMCA OF FL FIRST COAST: $75,000 · OtherST VINCENT'S FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $70,000 · Other+3 more: $85,000 · Other+3 moreUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $1,200,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INCGirl Scouts of Gateway Council Inc: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC: $60,000 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $30,000 · Human Services
    Other$1,430,000Philanthropy$1,200,000Youth Development$150,000Education$60,000Human Services$30,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC: $1,200,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGirl Scouts of Gateway Council Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetST VINCENT'S FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC ↗
    • Who funds Girl Scouts of Gateway Council Inc ↗
    • Who funds ST VINCENT'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds CATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC ↗
    • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization George M Baldwin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George M Baldwin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
    • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
    • United Way of Northeast Florida Inc: 2% of income from government
    • Cathedral Arts Project Inc: 1% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George M Baldwin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph