Skip to content

· Private foundation

George Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$73kHousing & Shelter$50kRecreation & Sports$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kMembership Benefit$17kEducation$10kReligion$10kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SENECA LITTLE LEAGUE$10,000
PDC EASTMAN METHODIST CHURCH$5,722
SOUTHWEST TECHNICAL COLLEGE$2,500
COULEE CAP$1,000
ROTARY CLUB OF PRAIRIE DU CHIEN$1,000
BOY SCOUT TROOP 320$885
PRAIRIE DU CHIEN SCHOOL DISTRICT$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MCGREGOR HOOK AND LADDER: $3k → 12%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WI INC: $1k → 10%SENECA LITTLE LEAGUE: $10k → 11%SOUTHWEST TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $3k → 13%COULEECAP INC: $1k → 15%MCGREGOR TURNER PARK: $1k → 12%EASTMAN FIRE DEPT: $3k → 11%CAMPERSHIP PROGRAM BADGER CAMP: $1k → 13%COULEE CAP-WITH CITY OF PR DU CHIEN: $50k → 11%CITY OF PRAIRIE DU CHIEN: $22k → 11%CITY OF PRAIRIE DU CHIEN: $18k → 11%CHILDRENS ADVISORY BOARD: $15k → 11%CITY OF PRAIRIE DU CHIEN: $10k → 11%CITY OF PRAIRIE DU CHIEN: $10k → 11%PRAIRIE DU CHIEN FIRE DEPT: $10k → 11%CITY OF PDC LIBRARY: $10k → 11%CITY OF PRAIRIE DU CHIEN: $10k → 11%PDC EASTMAN METHODIST CHURCH: $6k → 11%COULEECAP INC: $3k → 11%PRAIRIE DU CHIEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 11%BRIDGEPORT FIRE DEPT: $3k → 11%COULEE CAP: $3k → 11%COULEECAP INC: $2k → 11%CITY OF PRAIRIE DU CHIEN: $2k → 11%BOY SCOUTS TROOP 320: $2k → 11%ST PETER LUTHERAN CHURCH: $2k → 11%FENNIMORE MEDICAL CLINIC: $2k → 11%CRAWFORD COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH: $1k → 11%PRAIRIE DU CHIEN SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1k → 11%PDC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1k → 11%ADRC OF EAGLE COUNTY: $1k → 11%COULEECAP INC: $1k → 11%COULEE CAP: $1k → 11%ROTARY CLUB OF PRAIRIE DU CHIEN: $1k → 11%EAGLES HEART CANCER: $1k → 11%HOLY FAMILY J WALKERS: $1k → 11%J WALKERS: $1k → 11%OUTDOOR EDUCATION 6TH GRADE: $1k → 11%COULEECAP: $1k → 11%COULEE CAP-WITH CITY OF PR DU CHIEN: $1k → 11%TETRA BRAZIL YOUTH SOCCER PROGRAM: $1k → 11%COULEE CAP: $1k → 11%PDC SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1k → 11%PDC SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $1k → 11%PDC AREA GIRL SCOUTS: $1k → 11%WAUZEKA FIRE RESCUE DEPT: $8k → 11%WAUZEKA FIRE DEPT: $3k → 11%SENECA FIRE DEPT: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$100k · 6 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +113% since the first grant, against +102% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
36

Total granted

$100k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+113%
+102%

Still filing today

33%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Membership BenefitAnimalsArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CITY OF PRAIRIE DU CHIEN
    5× · 2017–2024 · $73k
  • CI
    COULEECAP INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +113%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2023 · $4k

Funded once

  • CC
    COULEE CAP-WITH CITY OF PR DU CHIEN
    one grant, 2022 · $51k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • CO
    CITY OF PDC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF PRAIRIE DU CHIEN: $73,334 · OtherCITY OF PRAIRIE DU CHIENCOULEE CAP-WITH CITY OF PR DU CHIEN: $51,000 · OtherCOULEE CAP-WITH CITY OF PR DU CHIENIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF PDC LIBRARY: $10,000 · OtherSENECA LITTLE LEAGUE: $10,000 · OtherPRAIRIE DU CHIEN FIRE DEPT: $10,000 · Other+37 more: $60,914 · Other+37 moreCOULEECAP INC: $16,659 · Membership BenefitPRAIRIE DU CHIEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,000 · InternationalRIVERS AND BLUFFS ANIMAL SHELTER: $500 · Animals
Other$230,248Membership Benefit$16,659Arts & Culture$3,500International$1,000Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOULEECAP INC: $16,659 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPRAIRIE DU CHIEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $3,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COULEECAP INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE DU CHIEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph