Skip to content

· Private foundation

George & Dorothy Vande Woude Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$60kEnvironment$17kScience & Tech$14kEducation$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kCommunity Improvement$2kFood & Nutrition$500
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$981k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH GOUNDATION$20,000
FREDERICK MEIJER GARDENS$12,500
VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$4,000
PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION$2,000
JOHN H ENDERS FIRE CO INC & RESCUE SQUAD$1,000
RURITAN CLUB OF CLARKE COUNTY$1,000
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE SCARS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%BREAST CANCER RESEARCH GOUNDATION: $20k → 17%FORCE (FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERMENT): $20k → 13%PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%FREDERICK MEIJER GARDENS: $13k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%FOUNDATION OF THE STATE ARBORETUM: $4k → 7%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE: $5k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%RURITAN CLUB OF CLARKE COUNTY: $1k → 7%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%JOHN H ENDERS FIRE CO INC & RESCUE SQUAD: $1k → 7%RURITAN CLUB OF CLARKE COUNTY: $1k → 7%JOHN H ENDERS FIRE CO INC & RESCUE SQUAD: $1k → 7%CLARKE AGRICULTURAL LEARNING FOUNDATION: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
CA
CO
VA
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29k · 6 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$29k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-4%

Still filing today

83%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +59%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k · revenue +50%
  • PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • FO
    FORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -6%
  • WI
    WOMEN IN SCIENCE WISCI NETWORK
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • TS
    THE SCARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Van Andel Research Institute

Medical research organization van andel research institute is an independent biomedical research organization committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations.

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
10
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parkinson's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ruritan National Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC: $20,000 · HealthFORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWE…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL I…PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INCFREDERICK MEIJER GARDENS: $12,500 · OtherFREDERICK MEIJER GARDENSWOMEN IN SCIENCE WISCI NETWORK: $7,000 · OtherWOMEN IN SCIENCE WISCI NETWOR…THE SCARS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherTHE SCARS FOUNDATIONJOHN H ENDERS FIRE CO INC & RESCUE SQUAD: $2,000 · OtherJOHN H ENDERS FIRE CO INC & R…+1 more: $500 · OtherTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BREAST CANCER RESE…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationVAN ANDEL INSTITUTE: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION OF THE STATE ARBORETUM OF VIRGINIA: $4,000 · EnvironmentRURITAN NATIONAL CORPORATION: $2,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $2,000 · Science & Tech
Health$35,000Other$27,000Public Safety & Disaster$20,000Education$8,000Philanthropy$5,000Environment$4,000Community Improvement$2,000Science & Tech$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVAN ANDEL INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE STATE ARBORETUM OF VIRGINIA: $4,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRURITAN NATIONAL CORPORATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George & Dorothy Vande Woude Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George & Dorothy Vande Woude Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Force-Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered Inc: 15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George & Dorothy Vande Woude Foundation?

Find your warmest path to George & Dorothy Vande Woude Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George & Dorothy Vande Woude’s filings →

More from the funding graph