· Private foundation
George & Belle Pearce Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
| BRIGHTHOUSE | $1,500 |
| FIRST CALL FOR HELP | $1,500 |
| HORIZONS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER | $1,250 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF RENO CO | $1,000 |
| RISE UP RENO PREVENTION NETWORK | $1,000 |
| FRIENDS IN ACTION | $1,000 |
| HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| INTERFAITH HOUSING SERVICES INC | $1,000 |
| HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $1,000 |
| BUHLER PUBLIC LIBRARY | $750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BIBRIGHTHOUSE INC8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +179%
- HMHORIZONS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC8× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +188%
- IHINTERFAITH HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICE9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY OF RENO COUNTYone grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +6%
- PHPRAIRIESTAR HEALTH CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +15%
- PVPLEASANT VIEW HOMEone grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Housing Services of Kansas City, Inc is focused on creating and preserving affordable housing for low income kansas city residents.
Atchison community health clinic exists to promote wellness by providing quality healthcare to all.
To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.
To operate a child care facility in hutchinson, kansas providing services to working parents in need of child care.
To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.
Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.to provide physical, emotional, and spiritual support and care for the terminally ill, families, and others through all phases of an illness so that they may live as fully and as…
Hutchinson county crisis center is a community based nonprofit agency committed to ending the cycle of domestic violence and sexual assault by providing safe residence for victims and their children, legal advocacy, interactive listening,…
Provide support for mennonite housing rehabilitation services, inc., which provides low-income housing for the elderly and disabled through hud housing programs that provide low-income families with ownership opportunities and the…
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Humankind ministries provides street outreach, shelter, affordable housing, supportive services, and basic needs to those experiencing homelessness or poverty in sedgwick county. recognizing the inherent value of each person, we serve the…
To advance the health of the douglas county community through comprehensive behavioral health services responsive to evolving needs and changing environments.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Childrens Service League and the most unlike its peers is Rise Up Reno Prevention Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds First Call for Help Inc ↗
- Who funds RISE UP RENO PREVENTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS EMERGENCY SHELTER HOME INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF RENO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PRAIRIESTAR HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PLEASANT VIEW HOME ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Herman Stallman Esther Stallman & Henry Stallman Foundation · Hutchinson Community Foundation · United Way of Reno County · Beach-Edwards Family Foundation · James a & Juliet L Davis Foundation Inc · Kansas Health Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Meyer Charitable Trust · Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Foundation Inc · Robert E and Patricia Schmidt Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · Global Impact
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George & Belle Pearce Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.