Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gee Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$149k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$413kRecreation & Sports$167kHealth$113kArts & Culture$78kReligion$67kHuman Services$32kAnimals$24kPhilanthropy$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $121k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST TEE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA$37,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$35,000
Spartanburg County Historical Socie$27,000
Atrium Health Foundation$12,000
SAFE HOMES$10,000
National MS Society$8,500
St Jude Childrens Hospital$4,000
Roll Call$3,000
Ronald McDonald House$3,000
The Humane Society of Charlotte$2,000
Nourish NC$2,000
Bethel Church$1,500
Karen Beasley Turtle Rescue$1,000
Mountain True$1,000
Feast Down East$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%National MS Society: $9k → 17%SAFE HOMES: $51k → 15%West Blvd Ministry: $10k → 17%Spartanburg County Historical Socie: $30k → 7%Purple Heart: $10k → 12%FIRST TEE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $37k → 15%The Episcopal Church of the Advent: $18k → 20%SAFE HOMES: $37k → 15%ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPI: $4k → 17%Spartanburg County Historical Socie: $27k → 7%FIRST TEE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $37k → 15%The Episcopal Church of the Advent: $13k → 20%SAFE HOMES: $20k → 15%ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPI: $4k → 17%Spartanburg County Historical Socie: $20k → 7%FIRST TEE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $34k → 15%SAFE HOMES: $19k → 15%ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPI: $4k → 17%Spartanburg County Historical Socie: $20k → 7%FIRST TEE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $34k → 15%SAFE HOMES: $19k → 15%Spartanburg County Historical Socie: $5k → 7%Atrium Health: $38k → 10%FIRST TEE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $25k → 15%SAFE HOMES: $10k → 15%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $35k → 10%Blue Ribbon Run: $6k → 12%SAFE HOMES: $8k → 15%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $18k → 10%Blue Ribbon Run: $6k → 12%Atrium Health: $14k → 10%Atrium Health: $14k → 10%West Blvd Ministry: $12k → 10%West Blvd Ministry: $12k → 10%Atrium Health: $12k → 10%West Blvd Ministry: $12k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $50k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40k → 10%FIRST TEE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $37k → 10%FIRST TEE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $35k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $25k → 10%Roll Call: $8k → 10%Roll Call: $8k → 10%Roll Call: $8k → 10%Atrium Health Foundation: $12k → 10%Charlotte Community Kitchen: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 19 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +106% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$1.0M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+23%

Still filing today

21%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionEnvironmentFood & NutritionAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WB
    West Blvd Ministry Inc
    5× · 2019–2023 · $37k · revenue +238%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $24k · revenue +99%
  • NC
    North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • HB
    Hearts beats as one
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • HF
    Hope From Helen Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
For Charlotte Inc

To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.

Religion
2
Habitat for Humanity of Burke County Inc

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with gods people in need by building houses, so that there are decent homes in decent communities in whigh gods people…

Housing & Shelter
3
Habitat for Humanity of High Point Archdale & Trinity Inc

Habitat for Humanity of High Point, Archdale and Trinity is an ecumenical Christian movement whose goal is to build safe, decent, affordable homes for our neighbors in need. Through conscience and action, Habitat utilizes volunteer labor…

Housing & Shelter
4
Cumberland County Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
5
Charleston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Charleston Habitat for Humanitys (CHFH) vision is a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Seeking to put God's love into action, Charleston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope. By…

—
6
Hearts for the Invisible Charlotte Coalition

Eradicating housing inequities for people experiencing homelessness

Human Services
7
Habitat for Humanity Cabarrus County

Guided by God, Habitat Cabarrus transforms lives and our community by uniting all of Cabarrus County around the cause of decent, affordable housing for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
8
The Hunger and Health Coalition Inc

The hunger and health coalition relieves poverty and hunger for households experiencing economic hardship and food insecurity. we serve low-income and uninsured residents of avery, watauga and ashe counties who are forced to choose between…

Food & Nutrition
9
Feeding the Carolinas

The mission of the Organization is to coordinate, support, and advocate for member Food Banks across the Carolinas to create lasting solutions to address hunger.

Food & Nutrition
10
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
11
Brunswick County Habitat for Humanity Incorporated

To provide low-cost housing for those in need in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
12
Greater Matthews Habitat for Humanity Inc

By the grace of God, Greater Matthews Habitat for Humanity improves lives by building communities and facilitating successful home ownership with people in need of decent, affordable homes.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atrium Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bethel Church Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $247,500 · OtherHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for HumanityFIRST TEE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $239,000 · OtherFIRST TEE OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINASAFE HOMES: $161,500 · OtherSAFE HOMESSpartanburg County Historical Socie: $105,000 · OtherSpartanburg County Historical SocieThe Episcopal Church of the Advent: $30,100 · Other+15 more: $104,801 · Other+15 moreATRIUM HEALTH INC: $81,500 · HealthATRIUM HEALT…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $24,000 · HealthST JUDE CHIL…ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,000 · HealthATRIUM HEALT…West Blvd Ministry Inc: $37,000 · ReligionBethel Church: $1,500 · ReligionNorth Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc: $7,501 · EnvironmentMountainTrue: $1,000 · EnvironmentNourishNC Inc: $2,000 · Food & NutritionFEAST DOWN EAST INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionHumane Society of Charlotte Inc: $2,000 · AnimalsHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SPARTANBURG I: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$887,901Health$117,500Religion$38,500Environment$8,501Food & Nutrition$3,000Animals$2,000Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $247,500 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetWest Blvd Ministry Inc: $37,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc: $7,501 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNourishNC Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHope From Helen Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SPARTANBURG I: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds West Blvd Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NourishNC Inc ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bethel Church ↗
  • Who funds FEAST DOWN EAST INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope From Helen Inc ↗
  • Who funds MountainTrue ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SPARTANBURG I ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gee Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gee Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gee Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph