Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gathering for Goodness CO James P Driskell

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Religion$182kInternational$43kHuman Services$36kHealth$11kHousing & Shelter$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kFood & Nutrition$650Crime & Legal$300Other$0
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k47 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADF Haiti$52,330
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
FCPC$2,630
Individual grant recipient$2,300
Blessings International$2,271
Individual grant recipient$1,950
Individual grant recipient$1,327
Individual grant recipient$1,250
Individual grant recipient$1,160
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
All Saints Campus Ministry$1,000
Agape Flights$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 46% of grant dollars ($131k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 54% that went abroad ($157k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%One Place of the Shoals: $300 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IA
MD
TN
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 54% of all-years giving ($157k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Haiti$157k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Gathering for Goodness CO James P Driskell’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 34% of the giving stays in AL; by stated purpose, 21%.

Gathering for Goodness CO James P Driskelllessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 74% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$263k · 21 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
52

Total granted

$263k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+1%

Still filing today

10%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JJ
    Jean Joab St Louis
    3× · 2023–2025 · $157k
  • F
    FCPC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $52k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $17k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
2
Shelterbox Usa Inc

The mission of shelterbox usa is to deliver humanitarian relief in the form of equipment and materials that bring shelter, warmth & dignity to people made homeless by natural or other disasters worldwide.

Human Services
3
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
4
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
5
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
6
Flying High for Haiti Corp
—
7
Medical Teams International

Medical teams international is a christian humanitarian relief agency focused on providing life-saving medical care for people in crisis.

International
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

International
10
Pure Water for the World Inc

Pure water for the world's mission is to improve lives by empowering people with access to life's most basic necessities: safe water and sanitation.

—
11
The Salvation Army World Service Office

To support and strengthen the salvation army's efforts to work hand in hand with communities to improve the health, economic, and spiritual conditions of the poor throughout the world.

International
12
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blessings International; the most unlike its peers is Home Free Haven Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jean Joab St Louis: $157,220 · OtherJean Joab St LouisFCPC: $52,045 · OtherFCPCIndividual grant recipient: $17,266 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+91 more: $87,793 · Other+91 moreADF HAITI INC: $52,330 · InternationalADF HAITI INCBLESSINGS INTERNATIONAL: $5,825 · InternationalBLESSINGS INTERNA…+3 more: $1,500 · InternationalHome Free Haven Inc: $3,250 · Housing & ShelterUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $500 · Human ServicesONE PLACE OF THE SHOALS INC: $300 · Human ServicesSHOALS DREAM CENTER INC: $500 · Community Improvement
Other$314,324International$59,655Housing & Shelter$3,250Human Services$2,300Community Improvement$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADF HAITI INC: $52,330 over 1y, 13% of budgetBLESSINGS INTERNATIONAL: $5,825 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHome Free Haven Inc: $3,250 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOALS DREAM CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE PLACE OF THE SHOALS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEPLACE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADF HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Home Free Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds United Help Ukraine Inc ↗
  • Who funds Agape Flights Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gathering for Goodness CO James P Driskell funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gathering for Goodness CO James P Driskell. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gathering for Goodness CO James P Driskell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph