Skip to content

· Private foundation

Garitty Charity Association

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2026.

Human Services$62kRecreation & Sports$27kCivil Rights$20kReligion$16kYouth Development$13kPhilanthropy$10kAnimals$6kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$482k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP OF THE RISING SUN$5,000
YMCA$4,000
COMPASSION CORSICANA$4,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALL$3,000
NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH$3,000
WADE WELLNESS SERVICES$3,000
PRO LIFE OF NAVARRO COUNTY$2,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SPECIAL OLYMPICS TEXAS: $1k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS-NORTH TEXAS REG: $2k → 14%COMPASSION CORSICANA: $8k → 23%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALL: $3k → 14%COMPASSION CORSICANA: $7k → 23%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALL: $3k → 14%COMPASSION CORSICANA: $7k → 23%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALL: $3k → 14%COMPASSION CORSICANA: $6k → 23%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALL: $3k → 14%YMCA: $6k → 23%BOY AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALLA: $1k → 14%YMCA: $5k → 23%PRO LIFE OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $5k → 23%PRO LIFE OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $5k → 23%PRO LIFE OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $5k → 23%UNITED WAY OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $5k → 23%UNITED WAY OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $5k → 23%YMCA: $5k → 23%YMCA: $5k → 23%YMCA: $4k → 23%YMCA: $4k → 23%COMPASSION CORSICANA: $4k → 23%COMPASSION CORSICANA: $4k → 23%NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 23%NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 23%WADE WELLNESS SERVICES: $3k → 23%NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 23%NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 23%NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 23%PRO LIFE OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $3k → 23%PRO LIFE OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $3k → 23%WADE WELLNESS SERVICES: $2k → 23%NORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 23%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 9 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$157k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+32%

Still filing today

33%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
Recreation & SportsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COMPASSION CORSICANA
    6× · 2021–2026 · $35k
  • Y
    YMCA
    6× · 2021–2026 · $28k
  • CO
    CAMP OF THE RISING SUN
    6× · 2021–2026 · $26k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS-NORTH TEXAS REG
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMPASSION CORSICANA: $34,500 · OtherCOMPASSION CORSICANAYMCA: $27,500 · OtherYMCAPROLIFE OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $20,000 · OtherPROLIFE OF NAVARRO COUNTYNORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherNORTHSIDE BAPTIST CHURCHBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALL: $12,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER DALLUNITED WAY OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NAVARRO COUNTYWADE WELLNESS SERVICES: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $4,000 · OtherCAMP OF THE RISING SUN: $26,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP OF THE RISING…SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsHUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $6,000 · Animals
Other$129,000Recreation & Sports$27,000Animals$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP OF THE RISING SUN: $26,000 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetPROLIFE OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $20,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY: $6,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP OF THE RISING SUN ↗
  • Who funds PROLIFE OF NAVARRO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF NAVARRO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Garitty Charity Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Garitty Charity Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Garitty Charity Association?

    Find your warmest path to Garitty Charity Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Garitty Charity Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph