Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Oklahoma · Public charity

Garfield County Child Advocacy Council Inc

Providing facilities related to the investigation and treatment of victims of child abuse and to provide education and coordination to child abuse prevention efforts by various organizations in Garfield County, OK.

$16k
Granted FY2019
1
Grants FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Garfield County Child Advocacy Council Inc’s FY2019 grant dollars went to Cherokee Strip Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
0
’18
0
’19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2019
$16,423
Largest grant, FY2019
$16,423
States reached, FY2019
1
Total assets, FY2019
$1.9M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Philanthropy$52k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2019.

Enid Community Foundation$16,423

Compare Garfield County Child Advocacy Council Inc with peer funders

About Garfield County Child Advocacy Council Inc

How much does Garfield County Child Advocacy Council Inc give?
Garfield County Child Advocacy Council Inc reported 1 grants totaling $16,423 in its FY2019 IRS filing.
What does Garfield County Child Advocacy Council Inc fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Where is Garfield County Child Advocacy Council Inc based?
Garfield County Child Advocacy Council Inc is based in OK.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Garfield County Child Advocacy Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home