Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gardenia Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$834k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$577kPhilanthropy$500kHealth$240kHuman Services$36kEnvironment$26kHousing & Shelter$25kArts & Culture$22kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $280k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARDENIA FOUNDATION FUND$500,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
UT HEALTH HOUSTON$80,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$50,000
VICTORY HOUSTON$50,000
WACGH$30,000
BAYOU BEND COLLECTIONS AND GARDEN$7,000
THE HERITAGE SOCIETY$5,000
WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL$5,000
URBAN HARVEST$2,500
HOUSTON BALLET$2,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR$1,200
INDUSTRY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%THE WOMENS HOME: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
2
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
3
Houston Geological Society Foundation
—
4
Houston Local Information Initiative Inc

The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.

Arts & Culture
5
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
6
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
7
Harmonia Stellarum Houston

Harmonia Stellarum is an ensemble of professional vocalists and instrumentalists specialized in historically informed performance practice who seek to inspire, entertain, and enlighten audiences with meaningful, historically informed…

Arts & Culture
8
Houston Christian Foundation dba National Christian Foundation Houston

As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

—
9
The Houston Parks Board Foundation

The Houston Parks Board Foundation provides the Houston Parks Board with financial assistance to support operations and park projects.

Environment
10
Houston Architecture Foundation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is the education of the publicconcerning the role of architecture and urban design in improving thequality of life for the city.

Arts & Culture
11
Houston Nursing Education Foundation
Education
12
Houston Endowment Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Houston Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GARDENIA FOUNDATION FUND: $500,000 · OtherGARDENIA FOUNDATION FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUT HEALTH HOUSTON: $80,000 · OtherUT HEALTH HOUSTONWACGH: $35,000 · Other+7 more: $23,200 · OtherHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $500,000 · EducationHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATIONUniversity of Houston Foundation: $75,000 · EducationUniversity of Houston FoundationPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $100,000 · HealthPLANNED PAR…VICTORY HOUSTON INC: $50,000 · HealthVICTORY HOU…OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthOSTEOGENESI…Hermann Park Conservancy: $26,000 · EnvironmentUrban Harvest Inc: $2,500 · EnvironmentTHE WOMEN'S HOME: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $15,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$738,200Education$575,000Health$160,000Environment$28,500Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$15,000Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $500,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $100,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetUniversity of Houston Foundation: $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVICTORY HOUSTON INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetHermann Park Conservancy: $26,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S HOME: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Heritage Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUrban Harvest Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDUSTRY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gardenia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gardenia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gardenia Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gardenia Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gardenia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph