· Public charity
Gallatin Development Corporation Dba Prospera Business Network
To advance and inspire diverse economies and resilient communities in southwest montana.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $36,150 |
| OPTIMALABS INC | $18,853 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,400 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 9% of Gallatin Development Corporation Dba Prospera Business Network’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in MT; by stated purpose, 89%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +50% for those funded once.
4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- WPWEST PAW2× · 2017–2018 · $105k
- RCRAVALLI COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY5× · 2017–2021 · $46k · revenue +52%
- BSBIG SKY BENEFIT SOLUTIONS2× · 2021–2022 · $25k
Funded once
- NANE45 ARCHITECTS - YGE LIVINGSTONone grant, 2017 · $73k
- FTFOUNDANT TECHNOLOGIES INCone grant, 2018 · $59k
- COCITY OF BOZEMANone grant, 2017 · $32k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Gallatin Development Corporation Dba Prospera Business Network funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gallatin Development Corporation Dba Prospera Business Network. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Gallatin Development Corporation Dba Prospera Business Network’s filings →