Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gail D Bassin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$154k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$396kArts & Culture$120kEducation$53kCivil Rights$44kPhilanthropy$22kSocial Science$15kHuman Services$13kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $143k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$540k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMENS HEALTH ACCESS MATTERS$45,000
NARAL$40,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$33,085
CLINTON FOUNDATION$15,000
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ART$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$7,500
EMILYS LIST$1,800
US AGAINST ALZHEIMERS$1,000
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ACCESS CIRCLES: $3k → 9%ACCESS CIRCLES: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
NV
CT
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$595k · 11 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
23

Total granted

$595k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+13%

Still filing today

73%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $260k · revenue +33%
  • TG
    The George Washington University
    3× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +22%
  • U
    USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S
    6× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • AH
    AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • TE
    The Economic Club of Washington DCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +89%
  • NW
    NATIONAL WOMEN'S MUSEUM
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
3
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
5
Women Action & the Media Corp

Gender equity in media access, representation, employment and ownership and a world in which a just media is considered essential to a just society. women, action & the media (wam) connects and supports media makers, activists, academics…

—
6
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
7
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
8
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
9
American College of Rheumatology Inc

The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…

—
10
Council of the Americas Inc

Council of the americas is a business organization whose members share a common commitment to economic and social development, open markets, the rule of law, and democracy throughout the americas. the council's membership consists of…

—
11
National Women's Health Resource Center Inc

Educate women about their health and to empower them to live healthy and productive lives.

Health
12
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National Museum of Women in the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $108,985 · OtherTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTSWOMENS HEALTH ACCESS MATTERS: $85,000 · OtherWOMENS HEALTH ACCESS MATTERSNARAL: $44,000 · OtherNARALUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDAMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · OtherAMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATIONThe Economic Club of Washington DC: $15,000 · Other+19 more: $40,886 · Other+19 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $260,160 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATIONUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $18,100 · HealthUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S+2 more: $350 · HealthThe George Washington University: $20,000 · EducationWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $5,000 · InternationalACCESSCIRCLES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $1,030 · PhilanthropyCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $2,200 · Civil Rights
Other$348,871Health$298,610Education$20,000International$5,000Human Services$5,000Philanthropy$3,030Civil Rights$2,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $260,160 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $108,985 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe George Washington University: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $18,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Economic Club of Washington DC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCESSCIRCLES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetN STREET VILLAGE INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $1,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S ↗
  • Who funds The Economic Club of Washington DC ↗
  • Who funds Women for Afghan Women Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSCIRCLES INC ↗
  • Who funds N STREET VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gail D Bassin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gail D Bassin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gail D Bassin Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gail D Bassin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gail D Bassin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph