Skip to content

· Public charity

Future Focused Education

FUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION's mission is to co-create systems of equity to sustain healthier and more prosperous communities for those who need it the most.

$445k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$185kEducation$180kInternational$110kCommunity Improvement$110kEmployment$110kCrime & Legal$75kCivil Rights$35kHuman Services$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SW EDUCATIONAL PARTNERS$110,000
PENASCO HISTORICAL PRESERVATION$110,000
GOLDEN FORWARD INC$75,000
NORTHWEST NM ARTS COUNCIL$75,000
EARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%PUBLIC ALLIES INC: $14k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$330k · 3 repeat orgs$499k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$330k
$204k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

100%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $295k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEnvironmentEmploymentArts & CultureCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NN
    NORTHWEST NEW MEXICO ARTS COUNCIL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $185k · revenue +3% · 65% of their budget
  • EC
    EARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL EARTH CARE NEW MEXICO
    2× · 2024–2025 · $110k · revenue 0%
  • TA
    THE ALBUQUERQUE CENTER FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $35k · revenue -22%

Funded once

  • DA
    Downtown ABQ Mainstreet Initiative
    one grant, 2024 · $110k · revenue 0%
  • SL
    SIEMBRA LEADERSHIP HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
  • TL
    TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
2
Hispanic Heritage Literature

Culture advance and literature

Arts & Culture
3
Esperanza Peace and Justice Center

To preserve and promote cultural expression, history and viewpoints that have been traditionally excluded from mainstream society, providing for cultural grounding and understanding among and across diverse communities as a basis for…

—
4
Southwest Collective

Provide an open forum for southwest side residents to voice their concerns, hear new perspectives from their neighbors, learn about existing public resources, launch economic, educational, and

Community Improvement
5
The Paseo Project Inc

The PASEO Projects mission is to transform art through community and community through art. The PASEO Project lives at the center of three primary values: Art, Education, and Community. The PASEO Projects community is both local and…

Arts & Culture
6
Fort Collins Mural Project

Our mission is to collaborate with local artists and businesses to promote contemporary art in public spaces in Fort Collins, Colorado. FCMP is focused on providing opportunities for underrepresented and emerging artists in Colorado.

Arts & Culture
7
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
8
Social and Emotional Learning Alliance for Nm

Social and emotional learning (SEL) is integral to human development and education. Through reliable developmental relationships, young people learn who they are and imagine who they might become as healthy, contributing adults in their…

Education
9
New Mexico Resiliency Alliance

The mission of the New Mexico Resiliency Alliance is to strengthen the resiliency of New Mexicos rural and underserved communities through mobilizing and leveraging resources and collaborative partnerships that enhance the economic…

Community Improvement
10
The Walls Project

The mission of the walls project is to break down societal barriers through the power of art, education, and community engagement. by fostering creativity, collaboration, and inclusivity, the walls project revitalizes underinvested…

Arts & Culture
11
Art for Resistance Through Change

Raise awareness of social justice

Arts & Culture
12
Neighborhood Wellness Foundation

Disrupting intergenerational trauma and poverty in Del Paso Heights and surrounging areas.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Albuquerque Center for Peace and Justice; the most unlike its peers is Wk Kellogg Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWEST NEW MEXICO ARTS COUNCIL: $185,000 · OtherNORTHWEST NEW MEXICO ARTS COUNCILTHE ALBUQUERQUE CENTER FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE: $35,000 · OtherTHE ALBUQUERQUE CENTER FOR PEACE AND JU…SIEMBRA LEADERSHIP HIGH SCHOOL: $17,500 · OtherSIEMBRA LEADERSHIP HIGH SCHOOLTECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP HIGH SCHOOL: $17,500 · OtherTECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP HIGH SCHOOLHEALTH LEADERSHIP HIGH SCHOOL: $17,500 · OtherHEALTH LEADERSHIP HIGH SCHOOLACE LEADERSHIP HIGH SCHOOL: $17,500 · OtherACE LEADERSHIP HIGH SCHOOLDowntown ABQ Mainstreet Initiative: $110,000 · Community ImprovementDowntown ABQ Ma…Southwest Educational Partners for Training: $110,000 · EmploymentSouthwest Educa…PENASCO VALLEY HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $110,000 · Arts & CulturePENASCO VALLEY …EARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL EARTH CARE NEW MEXICO: $110,000 · EnvironmentEARTH CARE INTE…Golden Forward Inc: $75,000 · Crime & LegalGolden For…PUBLIC ALLIES INC: $13,500 · Human ServicesWK Kellogg Foundation: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$290,000Community Improvement$110,000Employment$110,000Arts & Culture$110,000Environment$110,000Crime & Legal$75,000Human Services$13,500Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST NEW MEXICO ARTS COUNCIL: $185,000 over 2y, 65% of budgetDowntown ABQ Mainstreet Initiative: $110,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetSouthwest Educational Partners for Training: $110,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetPENASCO VALLEY HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $110,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetEARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL EARTH CARE NEW MEXICO: $110,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetGolden Forward Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 94% of budgetTHE ALBUQUERQUE CENTER FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE: $35,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetPUBLIC ALLIES INC: $13,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWK Kellogg Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Future Focused Education funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Future Focused Education. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Future Focused Education?

    Find your warmest path to Future Focused Education through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Future Focused Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph