Skip to content
Fund for the Aged Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Fund for the Aged Inc

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

$9.1M
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$6.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$41MHealth$19MHousing & Shelter$11MInternational$162k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
  • $250k+4 grants · $9.0M
$715,766
Median grant
1
States reached
$95M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN$6,680,917
JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER$1,185,815
JEWISH HOME LIFECARE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG BRONX CAMPUS$715,766
JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SPECTRUM SERVICES INC$433,899
KITTAY HOUSE$85,000
JEWISH HOME LIFECARE UNIVERSITY AVENUE ASSISTED LIVING INC$20,578
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%156 WEST 106TH STREET HOLDING CORP: $10.0M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN: $9.0M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN: $7.4M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN: $6.7M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN: $5.4M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER: $5.2M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN: $4.1M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN: $3.8M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG BRONX CAMPUS: $2.8M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG BRONX CAMPUS: $2.6M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN: $2.1M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER: $2.0M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER: $1.4M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER: $1.2M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER: $1.2M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG BRONX CAMPUS: $1.0M → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER: $822k → 17%KITTAY HOUSE: $750k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG BRONX CAMPUS: $716k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE UNIVERSITY AVENUE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $689k → 17%KITTAY HOUSE: $436k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SPECTRUM SERVICES INC: $434k → 17%KITTAY HOUSE: $284k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER: $256k → 17%KITTAY HOUSE: $256k → 17%KITTAY HOUSE: $160k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE UNIVERSITY AVENUE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $148k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG BRONX CAMPUS: $124k → 17%KITTAY HOUSE: $85k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $81k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE HOME ASSISTANCE PERSONNEL INC: $63k → 17%KITTAY HOUSE: $58k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE HOME ASSISTANCE PERSONNELL INC: $58k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $33k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $26k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $22k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE UNIVERSITY AVENUE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $21k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE UNIVERSITY AVENUE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $21k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE UNIVERSITY AVENUE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $20k → 17%HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG GARDENS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CO INC: $9k → 17%HARRY & JEANETTE WEINBERG RIVERDALE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CO INC: $8k → 17%KENNETH GLADSTONE BUILDING HOUSING INC DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC: $8k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SPECTRUM SERVICES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES: $5k → 17%JEWISH HOME LIFECARE UNIVERSITY AVENUE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 99% of Fund for the Aged Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 1%.

Fund for the Aged Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61M · 8 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$61M
$10M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+4%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHousing & ShelterInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38M · revenue -13%
  • JH
    JEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER WESTCHESTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12M · revenue +5%
  • JH
    JEWISH HOME LIFECARE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG CAMPUS BRONX
    6× · 2019–2024 · $7.3M · revenue -77% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • 1W
    156 WEST 106TH STREET HOLDING CORP
    one grant, 2019 · $10M · 100% of their budget
  • HJ
    HARRY & JEANETTE WEINBERG RIVERDALE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $17k · revenue +39%
  • KG
    KENNETH GLADSTONE BUILDING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Home Lifecare

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

—
2
Fund for the Aged Inc

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

Human Services
3
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
4
Jewish Home of Central New York Residential Living Inc

Jewish home of central new york residential living's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home is committed to maintaining…

Human Services
5
Jewish Home Life Communities Inc

Provided facilities and services for those elderly and disabled who need long- and short-term physical, psychological, and/or social care in a manner consistent with Jewish values. Serve as one of the professional resources to the…

Housing & Shelter
6
Jha Geriatric Services Inc

Excellence in senior care reflective of jewish values.

Health
7
The Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale

To provide long term residential healthcare, short term rehab, assisted living, and alzheimer's care for older adults.

Health
8
Hebrew Home & Hospital

The mission of hebrew home and hospital aligns with the mission of its parent organization, hebrew health care, to provide quality services to senior adults. (see schedule o)as part of an integrated system to assist seniors in the…

Health
9
Jewish Home of Central New York Inc

Jewish home's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. menorah park is committed to maintaining jewish values and traditions.

—
10
Jewish Home At Rockleigh

We must strive to be proactive - to be aware of and ready to serve, the needs of the increasing numbers of our elderly (given the improvement of longevity) with the newest methods and programs we must insure the continuity and vitality of…

Health
11
Jewish Home Moderate Housing Inc

To provide independent housing for seniors and community members through the jsl system.

Housing & Shelter
12
United Jewish Council of the East Side Home Attendant Service Corpor

United jewish council of the east side home attendant services corp has contracted with various mco's and mltc's to provide home care services to disabled and/or elder individuals. as of march 1, 2014 the agency terminated its contract for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Home Lifecare Community Services; the most unlike its peers is 156 West 106TH Street Holding Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN: $38,472,635 · HealthJEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTANJEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER WESTCHESTER: $11,983,021 · HealthJEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER WESTCHESTERJEWISH HOME LIFECARE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG CAMPUS BRONX: $7,301,569 · HealthJEWISH HOME LIFECARE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG CAMPUS BRONX156 WEST 106TH STREET HOLDING CORP: $10,000,000 · Community Improvement156 WEST 106TH …KITTAY HOUSE JEWISH HOME LIFECARE INC: $2,029,327 · OtherJEWISH HOME LIFECARE SPECTRUM SERVICES INC: $439,013 · OtherJEWISH HOME LIFECARE HOME ASSISTANCE PERSONNEL INC: $121,307 · OtherJEWISH HOME LIFECARE UNIVERSITY AVENUE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $903,979 · Housing & Shelter+2 more: $24,123 · Housing & ShelterJEWISH HOME LIFECARE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $162,192 · International
Health$57,757,225Community Improvement$10,000,000Other$2,589,647Housing & Shelter$928,102International$162,192

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN: $38,472,635 over 8y, 12% of budgetJEWISH HOME LIFECARE SARAH NEUMAN CENTER WESTCHESTER: $11,983,021 over 8y, 11% of budget156 WEST 106TH STREET HOLDING CORP: $10,000,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetJEWISH HOME LIFECARE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG CAMPUS BRONX: $7,301,569 over 6y, 100% of budgetKITTAY HOUSE JEWISH HOME LIFECARE INC: $2,029,327 over 7y, 14% of budgetJEWISH HOME LIFECARE UNIVERSITY AVENUE ASSISTED LIVING INC: $903,979 over 7y, 17% of budgetJEWISH HOME LIFECARE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $162,192 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetHARRY & JEANETTE WEINBERG RIVERDALE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CO INC: $16,524 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetKENNETH GLADSTONE BUILDING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC: $7,599 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fund for the Aged Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fund for the Aged Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $6.1M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fund for the Aged’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home