Skip to content

· Public charity

Fulbright & Jaworski Foundation

The corporation is organized exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes.

$383k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$141k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Education$386kInternational$141kCrime & Legal$74kCivil Rights$48kHealth$15kPhilanthropy$7k
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $304,474, the rows itemized in this filing. The $383,458 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $78,984 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $212k
$24,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE THE CHILDREN$140,686
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$71,788
TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER$24,000
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND$24,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$24,000
HOUSTON BAR FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $50k → 14%ADVENTIST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 18%NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $24k → 17%AUSTIN BAR FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%UNITED WAY OF DALLAS: $7k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $142k → 16%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $141k → 9%TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $24k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $50k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $72k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $71k → 16%HOUSTON BAR FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%HOUSTON BAR FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$426k · 3 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$426k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-6%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22
Civil RightsEducationPhilanthropyInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    3× · 2019–2022 · $286k · revenue +47%
  • UO
    University of St Thomas
    2× · 2019–2020 · $100k · revenue +38%
  • HB
    Houston Bar Foundation
    2× · 2020–2022 · $40k · revenue -30%

Funded once

  • AH
    Adventist Health Medical Ctr Tehachapi dba Adventist Health Tehachapi Valleygraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +100%
  • AB
    AUSTIN BAR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -6%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
The Bar Association of San Francisco

The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…

—
3
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
4
South Texas College of Law Houston Inc

South texas college of law houston provides a diverse body of students the opportunity to obtain an exceptional legal education, preparing graduates to serve their community and profession with distinction.

Education
5
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
6
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
7
American Health Law Association

The mission of the american health law association is to deliver authoritative educational content and serve as a professional home for all who engage with health law.

—
8
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
9
Twin Cities Diversity in Practice

To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.

Community Improvement
10
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
11
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
12
Tarrant County Bar Association

The association exists to advance the science of jurisprudence; to facilitate and improve the administration of justice; to maintain and to elevate standards of professional conduct; to increase professional skills through regular…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Austin Bar Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Baylor College of Medicine: $285,535 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineUniversity of St Thomas: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of St ThomasSave The Children Federation Inc: $140,686 · InternationalSave The Children Feder…NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $24,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL …ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $24,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMAT…THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $24,000 · Civil RightsTHE TAHIRIH …Houston Bar Foundation: $40,000 · Crime & LegalAdventist Health Medical Ctr Tehachapi dba Adventist Health Tehachapi Valley: $15,000 · OtherAUSTIN BAR FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $7,000 · Philanthropy
Education$385,535International$140,686Civil Rights$72,000Crime & Legal$40,000Other$25,000Philanthropy$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $285,535 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $140,686 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Bar Foundation: $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $24,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $24,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $24,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAdventist Health Medical Ctr Tehachapi dba Adventist Health Tehachapi Valley: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN BAR FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fulbright & Jaworski Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fulbright & Jaworski Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fulbright & Jaworski Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fulbright & Jaworski Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $110k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fulbright & Jaworski’s filings →

More from the funding graph