Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Washington · Public charity

Fsc I&P

FSC I&P promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. This mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations. FSC I&P engages in partnerships on aligned priorities supporting program design, fund development and…

$175k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2020
0%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$63k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$62,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$62,500
Organizations funded a year
1 to 1
FY2019 to FY2020
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$4.4M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 0% of the organizations Fsc I&P funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$63k0%
FY20201$47k0%
FY20191$47kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Environment$157k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
US Working Group Inc$156,50032%

Compare Fsc I&P with peer funders

About Fsc I&P

How much does Fsc I&P give?
Fsc I&P reported 1 itemized grants totaling $62,500, out of $175,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 1 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2020.
What does Fsc I&P fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (100%).
Who are Fsc I&P's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: US Working Group Inc ($157k).
Does Fsc I&P fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Fsc I&P based?
Fsc I&P is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fsc I&P’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home