Skip to content

· Public charity

Friends of Re'Aim Mesamchei Hashabbos

Grants to jewish religious, educational and social service organizations in need.

$382k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$477kPhilanthropy$35kHuman Services$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $14,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $382,466 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $368,466 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$263k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AZRAS YISROEL$14,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CONGREGATION CHASADIM TOVIM: $9k → 14%AZRAS YISROEL: $89k → 20%TOMCHEI TZEDAKA: $7k → 11%CONGREGATION CHASADIM TOVIM: $9k → 14%AZRAS YISROEL: $67k → 20%MOSDOS LELOV: $65k → 20%MOSDOS LELOV: $36k → 20%MOSDOS LELOV: $35k → 20%AZRAS YISROEL: $26k → 20%AZRAS YISROEL: $14k → 20%AZRAS YISROEL: $14k → 20%AMERACIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS: $70k → 20%ICHUD MOSDOS GUR: $10k → 20%AMERACIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS: $50k → 20%TOMCHEI TORAH: $6k → 20%AMERACIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS: $14k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $361k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$361k · 100% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: EDUCATIONAL

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$496k · 4 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +160% since the first grant, against +53% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$496k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+160%
+53%

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EY
    EZRAS YISROEL
    5× · 2019–2024 · $209k
  • ML
    MOSDOS LELOV
    3× · 2021–2023 · $136k · revenue +40% · 45% of their budget
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH
    3× · 2019–2021 · $134k · revenue +160%

Funded once

  • IM
    ICHUD MOSDOT GUR
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • TT
    TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +53%
  • TT
    TOMCHEI TORAH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOSDOS LELOV: $135,700 · PhilanthropyMOSDOS LELOVAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH: $134,100 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESHEZRAS YISROEL: $209,400 · OtherEZRAS YISROELCONGREGATION CHASADIM TOVIM INC: $17,100 · OtherCONGREGATION CHASADIM TOVIM INCICHUD MOSDOT GUR: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $6,150 · OtherTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $6,612 · Religion
Philanthropy$269,800Other$242,650Religion$6,612

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOSDOS LELOV: $135,700 over 3y, 45% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH: $134,100 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $6,612 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOSDOS LELOV ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Friends of Re'Aim Mesamchei Hashabbos funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Friends of Re'Aim Mesamchei Hashabbos. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Friends of Re'Aim Mesamchei Hashabbos’ filings →

    More from the funding graph