Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Friends of Golf Inc

Raise money for organizations (primarily colleges and universities) to assist them in the establishment and/or maintenance of golf programs or to provide scholarships to students.

$479k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Recreation & Sports$749kEducation$139k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $447,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $478,700 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $31,700 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $250k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $190k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$653k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEL-AIR COUNTRY CLUB$125,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$65,000
Individual grant recipient$47,000
CIF LOS ANGELES CITY SECTION$30,000
SCGA YOUTH ON COURSE$30,000
PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$25,000
SCPGA FOUNDATION$21,000
TGR FOUNDATION$20,000
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
GOLF COACHES ASSOCIATION (HOGAN AWARD)$10,000
LONG BEACH STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
MOUNT ST JOSEPH'S HIGH SCHOOL$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TGR FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%CIF SAN DIEGO: $12k → 11%SCPGA FOUNDATION: $21k → 14%BEL-AIR COUNTRY CLUB: $125k → 14%GOLF COACHES ASSOCIATION (HOGAN AWARD): $10k → 13%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%MOUNT ST JOSEPH'S HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 19%CIF SOUTHERN SECTION: $47k → 10%CIF SAN DIEGO: $12k → 11%SCPGA FOUNDATION: $16k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $25k → 14%GOLF COACHES ASSOCIATION (HOGAN AWARD): $10k → 13%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%MOUNT ST JOSEPH'S HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 19%CIF SOUTHERN SECTION: $47k → 10%CIF SAN DIEGO: $6k → 11%SCPGA FOUNDATION: $9k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $25k → 14%EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CIF SOUTHERN SECTION: $24k → 10%SCGA YOUTH ON COURSE: $35k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%SCGA YOUTH ON COURSE: $30k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%SCGA YOUTH ON COURSE: $25k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $65k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $65k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $33k → 14%NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 14%CIF LOS ANGELES CITY SECTION: $30k → 14%CIF LOS ANGELES CITY SECTION: $30k → 14%LONG BEACH STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%CIF LOS ANGELES CITY SECTION: $15k → 14%LONG BEACH STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$687k · 11 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$687k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
0%

Still filing today

27%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’24
EducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CIF LOS ANGELES CITY SECTION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +328%
  • PU
    PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $63k · revenue +4%
  • SF
    SCPGA FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $46k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • ND
    NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES — $162,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELESBEL-AIR COUNTRY CLUB — $125,000 · OtherBEL-AIR COUNTRY CLUBIndividual grant recipient — $117,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSCGA YOUTH ON COURSE — $90,000 · OtherSCGA YOUTH ON COURSEEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · Other+4 more — $59,000 · Other+4 morePEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $62,600 · EducationPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN…SCPGA FOUNDATION INC — $46,100 · EducationSCPGA FOUNDATION INCTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · EducationTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION…CIF LOS ANGELES CITY SECTION — $75,000 · Recreation & SportsCIF LOS A…
Other$634,000Education$178,700Recreation & Sports$75,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBEL-AIR COUNTRY CLUB — $125,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCIF LOS ANGELES CITY SECTION — $75,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $62,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCPGA FOUNDATION INC — $46,100 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEL-AIR COUNTRY CLUB
  • Who funds CIF LOS ANGELES CITY SECTION
  • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds SCPGA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TIGER WOODS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Friends of Golf Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph