Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

New Hampshire · Public charity

Free and Accepted Masons of N Hampshire 87 Mt Washington Lodge

The primary purpose of freemasonry is to promote an honest, charitable, and compassionate lifestyle that revolves around supporting local communities.

$395k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Grants FY2024
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

73% of Free and Accepted Masons of N Hampshire 87 Mt Washington Lodge’s FY2024 grant dollars went to New Hampshire Charitable Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2024
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$284,193
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$131k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Candid$100,00010%
Kennett Football Boosters$8,000115%

Compare Free and Accepted Masons of N Hampshire 87 Mt Washington Lodge with peer funders

About Free and Accepted Masons of N Hampshire 87 Mt Washington Lodge

How much does Free and Accepted Masons of N Hampshire 87 Mt Washington Lodge give?
Free and Accepted Masons of N Hampshire 87 Mt Washington Lodge reported 3 grants totaling $394,876 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Free and Accepted Masons of N Hampshire 87 Mt Washington Lodge fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (72%), Religion (25%), Education (2%).
Who are Free and Accepted Masons of N Hampshire 87 Mt Washington Lodge's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2024: Candid ($100k), Kennett Football Boosters ($8k).
Where is Free and Accepted Masons of N Hampshire 87 Mt Washington Lodge based?
Free and Accepted Masons of N Hampshire 87 Mt Washington Lodge is based in NH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Free and Accepted Masons of N Hampshire 87 Mt Washington Lodge’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home