Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fredd and Marjorie Isaksen Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$200kHealth$60kPhilanthropy$15kReligion$9kScience & Tech$8kArts & Culture$5kEnvironment$350Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$845k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION$10,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$10,000
BERKSHIRE SCHOOL$10,000
NORWEGIAN SEAMEN'S CHURCH$6,000
GREEN VALE SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
PORTLEDGE SCHOOL$2,500
VARIOUS RECOGNIZED CHARITIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$333k · 8 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$333k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+18%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesScience & TechArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +22%
  • TB
    THE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +26%
  • CS
    COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
    2× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • SP
    SCYC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • TN
    THE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $350 · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
The Storm King School

The storm king school, a global community, prepares students by inspiring them toward academic success and confidence in an inclusive and diverse learning environment that embraces character, balance, and trust.

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Portledge School; the most unlike its peers is Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREEN VALE SCHOOL: $160,000 · EducationGREEN VALE SCHOOLTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC: $20,000 · EducationTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INCUNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $35,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAINEVARIOUS RECOGNIZED CHARITIES: $15,880 · OtherVARIOUS RECOGNIZED CHAR…NORWEGIAN SEAMENS CHURCH INC: $14,500 · OtherNORWEGIAN SEAMENS CHURC…Individual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherPORTLEDGE SCHOOL: $2,500 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S D…MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGART…COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $8,100 · Science & TechSCYC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC: $350 · Environment
Education$180,000Other$71,880Health$40,000Human Services$40,000Science & Tech$8,100Arts & Culture$5,000Environment$350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREEN VALE SCHOOL: $160,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $8,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCYC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetPORTLEDGE SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREEN VALE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds SCYC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTLEDGE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fredd and Marjorie Isaksen Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fredd and Marjorie Isaksen Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fredd and Marjorie Isaksen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph