Skip to content

· Public charity

Fraternal Order of Police #126

Fraternal organization of active and retired police officers.

$43k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0169% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$21kFood & Nutrition$18kEducation$11kEmployment$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kCommunity Improvement$7kRecreation & Sports$5kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $32,208, the rows itemized in this filing. The $43,408 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$226k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,816
FLINT DIAPER BAND DRIVE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,254
HUNDRED CLUB$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,073
DAVISON COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$2,000
GENESEE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER$1,100
CITY OF FLINT$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
ICE FASTPITCH$750
MID MICHIGAN K9 ASSESEMENT$525
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%VFW 4087 AUXILLARY: $4k → 16%VFW #4087: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71k · 15 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
43

Total granted

$71k
$48k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGAN
    3× · 2020–2022 · $18k
  • L
    LEORTC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $16k
  • DS
    DAVISON SCHOOLS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $7k

Funded once

  • EC
    ELGA CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY DRIVES
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • FF
    FOP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • FA
    FLINT AREA NARCOTIC GROUP
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2020 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGAN: $18,487 · OtherFOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGANLEORTC: $16,200 · OtherLEORTCDAVISON SCHOOLS: $7,400 · OtherHUNDRED CLUB: $6,500 · OtherELGA CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY DRIVES: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,816 · OtherFLINT DIAPER BAND DRIVE: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,900 · Other+66 more: $70,516 · Other+66 more
Other$140,819

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fraternal Order of Police #126?

Find your warmest path to Fraternal Order of Police #126 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fraternal Order of Police #126’s filings →

More from the funding graph