How much did FRANK S & ANTOINETTE G LETA grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of FRANK S & ANTOINETTE G LETA’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

louis

2020

paullouis

2021

housingmaintain enhanceenhance studentsstudents education

2022

veteranslearnmaintain enhanceenhance studentsstudents educationyouthresearch

2023

catholic educationaround louisrescueparishplacechurchstudents

2024

religionparisheducationyouthresearchmaintainneedy

2025

libraryvincentcharlesfoodaffectedsustainmaintain

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k22 grants · $44k
$10k–50k3 grants · $70k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$1.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$50,000
EPWORTH CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES$30,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$26,595
ST LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$13,516
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ST LOUIS$7,964
SACRED HEART SVDP$6,000
CARITAS CONNECTIONS$5,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$3,000
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS$3,000
URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS$3,000
GOOD SHEPHERD CATHOLIC CHURCH ST VINCENT DEPAUL$3,000
HOLY INFANT ST VINCENT DE PAUL$3,000
MICHAEL BROWN SR CHOSEN FOR CHANGE FUND$2,500
ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART$1,500
THE COVERING HOUSE$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 18% of FRANK S & ANTOINETTE G LETA’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

FRANK S & ANTOINETTE G LETAlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$739k · 29 repeat orgs$271k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$739k

$249k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%

+54%

Still filing today

34%

35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesAnimalsHealthRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL
4× · 2022–2025 · $169k · revenue +74%
CC
CARITAS CONNECTIONS
7× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +86%
SR
STRAY RESCUE OF ST LOUIS
3× · 2019–2023 · $32k · revenue +60%

Funded once

SL
SAINT LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER
one grant, 2021 · $74k
SL
ST LOUIS SYMPHONY
one grant, 2019 · $15k
DO
DEFENDERS OF THE UNBORN
one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue -19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Casa of St Louis

Advocate for abused and neglected children in st. louis

Civil Rights

Catholic Charities of Central and

Inspired by the Gospel of the Beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…

Human Services

St Louis University

To seek excellence in teaching, research, health care, and service to the community as guided by the spiritual and intellectual ideals of the society of jesus.

Education

St Louis Community Foundation

Administer charitable funds for the betterment of st. louis

Philanthropy

Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St. Cloud is a nonprofit human services organization that in 2024 served 47,220 individuals of all faiths and beliefs across Central Minnesota.

Human Services

Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships.

Community Improvement

Catholic Education Foundation Inc

To promote the growth and vitality of catholic education in the archdiocese of louisville.

Education

St Louis Christian College

Christian education

—

St Francis Community Services

Helping individuals and families become sustainable by working with them over time through mentorship and training to develop the tools to overcome barriers to success and to foster the skills necessary for a more secure and satisfying…

—

Variety the Childrens Charity of St Louis

Variety empowers children with special needs by providing medical equipment, therapy, and innovative programs.

—

Jewish Federation of St Louis

Preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel, and around the world.

Philanthropy

Catholic Charities of St Louis

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence. our values are dignity, hospitality, service, excellence, compassion, and joy.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is The Ray & Diana Mungenast. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/40

the rest of the field

12%

1,560/12,862

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

32/33

Grantees still filing

22/33

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$673,838Health$174,255Human Services$57,934Animals$43,140Food & Nutrition$37,496Philanthropy$13,200International$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO26.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Herbert and Adrian Woods Fdn · Ross Family Foundation · Berges Family Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FRANK S & ANTOINETTE G LETA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DIVINE NEST.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 821011127 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DIVINE NEST, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Frank S & Antoinette G Leta?

Find your warmest path to Frank S & Antoinette G Leta through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FRANK S & ANTOINETTE G LETA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Frank S & Antoinette G Leta?

More from the funding graph

FRANK S & ANTOINETTE G LETA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

33 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Frank S & Antoinette G Leta?

More from the funding graph