· Private foundation
Frank R Fuller U Art X O W
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $133k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT | $36,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD | $29,500 |
| QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY | $21,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND | $13,750 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON | $11,000 |
| VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY | $11,000 |
| ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $10,000 |
| MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY | $8,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH | $7,500 |
| EASTERN CT STATE UNIVERSITY | $7,500 |
| ITHACA COLLEGE | $7,500 |
| BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY | $7,500 |
| BOSTON UNIVERSITY | $7,500 |
| WORCHESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE | $7,000 |
| SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY | $6,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD2× · 2024–2025 · $54k · revenue +6%- QUQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY2× · 2024–2025 · $38k · revenue +11%
- VUVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY2× · 2024–2025 · $21k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- QUQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $17k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF BRIDGEPORTone grant, 2022 · $13k
- BUBRYANT UNIVERSITYone grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
Education and Research
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Quinnipiac University and the most unlike its peers is Ithaca College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
- Who funds QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ITHACA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MARIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BRYANT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LESLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frank R Fuller U Art X O W funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 8% of income from government
- University of Hartford — 1% of income from government
- Quinnipiac University — 0% of income from government
- Lesley University — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.