Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

South Carolina · Private foundation

Frances and Mason Alexander Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
5
Organizations funded FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$4,741
Largest grant, FY2020
$41,095
States reached, FY2020
3
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
North Charleston Dental Outreach Inc$1,30010%
The Ladies Fuel Society$7501n/a
Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired South Carolina$75010%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($62k), not named here.

Compare Frances and Mason Alexander Foundation with peer funders

About Frances and Mason Alexander Foundation

How much does Frances and Mason Alexander Foundation give?
Frances and Mason Alexander Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $65,182 in its FY2020 IRS filing.
What does Frances and Mason Alexander Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2020, its largest causes are Public Benefit (70%), Human Services (25%), Health (3%).
Who are Frances and Mason Alexander Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2020: North Charleston Dental Outreach Inc ($1k), The Ladies Fuel Society ($750), Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired South Carolina ($750).
Does Frances and Mason Alexander Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is Frances and Mason Alexander Foundation based?
Frances and Mason Alexander Foundation is based in SC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frances and Mason Alexander’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home