Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fox Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$374k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$167k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$550kEducation$249kHealth$151kHuman Services$37kFood & Nutrition$10kRecreation & Sports$6kPhilanthropy$4kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $367k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$422k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRUNSWICK SCHOOL$167,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$150,000
VIRGINIA ATHELETICS FOUNDATION$50,000
COVENANT HOUSE SLEEP OUT$5,000
NAVY LEAGUE FOUNDATION (CONNETICUT COUNCIL)$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$727k · 7 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$727k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+8%

Still filing today

57%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $550k · revenue +24%
  • HL
    HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +57%
  • NU
    Norwich University
    2× · 2021–2022 · $5k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • TR
    THE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • RF
    RATE FOUNDATION NFP
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
4
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education
7
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
8
Northeast Conference

The conference is committed to providing quality athletics competition integral to and consistent with its member institutions' academic missions. the conference is dedicated to providing opportunities for student-athletes to achieve their…

—
9
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
10
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
11
Middlesex School

Middlesex school helps students find their promise through rigorous intellectual, physical, creative, and ethical education. we value integrity, kindness, inclusivity, excellence, and engagement in service or our community and the wider…

Education
12
New York Military Academy

The mission of New York Military Academy is to prepare them for further education and to be effective leaders and responsible citizens, to develop the cadets in mind, body, and character; to prepare them for further education and to be…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brunswick School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Harlem Lacrosse and Leadership Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $550,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INCVIRGINIA ATHELETICS FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherVIRGINIA ATHELETICS FOUNDAT…UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIATHE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $25,000 · OtherTHE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSECOVENANT HOUSE SLEEP OUT: $11,850 · Other+4 more: $9,500 · OtherBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $167,000 · EducationBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INCRATE FOUNDATION NFP: $25,000 · EducationRATE FOUNDATION NFP+2 more: $6,000 · EducationFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION: $5,500 · Recreation & SportsCity Squash Inc: $525 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$550,000Other$246,350Education$198,000Human Services$10,000Recreation & Sports$6,025

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $550,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $167,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRATE FOUNDATION NFP: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorwich University: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCity Squash Inc: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds RATE FOUNDATION NFP ↗
  • Who funds FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Norwich University ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds City Squash Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fox Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fox Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Norwich University: 4% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fox Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph