Skip to content

· Private foundation

Foursight Foundation

$15k
Granted FY2020
4
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Human Services$154kHealth$35kHousing & Shelter$28kFood & Nutrition$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kReligion$8kRecreation & Sports$6kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2020 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLEANER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$7,500
HARBOR SPRINGS FOOD PANTRY$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$2,500
SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS: $5k → 21%SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
WY
CA
MD
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$201k · 13 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2020, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$201k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+99%

Still filing today

38%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Public BenefitHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    The Independence Fund Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $50k · revenue +13%
  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $28k · revenue +262%
  • SF
    SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $16k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +99%
  • TS
    THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN CHIL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY NAPLES: $25,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY NAPLESTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CH: $17,500 · OtherTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSEMPER FI FUNDS- VETS: $15,000 · OtherSEMPER FI FUNDS- VETSTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN CHIL: $10,000 · OtherTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN CHILST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH CENTER: $10,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH CENTERTRINITY BY THE COVE: $8,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH CENTER: $7,500 · OtherCAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN: $7,500 · OtherGLEANER COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $7,500 · OtherMICHIGAN SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $6,000 · Other+8 more: $28,900 · Other+8 moreThe Independence Fund Inc: $50,000 · Public BenefitThe Independence Fu…ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $27,500 · Housing & ShelterST MATTHEW…SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER: $16,000 · Human ServicesAir Warrior Courage Foundation: $15,000 · PhilanthropyWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · Health
Other$157,900Public Benefit$50,000Housing & Shelter$27,500Human Services$16,000Philanthropy$15,000International$10,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Independence Fund Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER: $16,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAir Warrior Courage Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Independence Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVICES FOR OLDER CITIZENS INC DBA THE HELM AT THE BOLL LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Air Warrior Courage Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foursight Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foursight Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Foursight Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Foursight Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foursight’s filings →

    More from the funding graph