Skip to content
Fountain of Living Water Ministries at a glance

· Private foundation

Fountain of Living Water Ministries

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$185kHuman Services$98kReligion$83kInternational$13kCrime & Legal$4kFood & Nutrition$3kPhilanthropy$2kHealth$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$669
Median grant
6
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASCEND CHURCH$17,062
TITHELY$14,157
VOICE OF THE MARTYRS$3,550
THE WATER PROJECT$3,000
LIBERTY TABERNACLE$669
WATERORG$500
COMPASSION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL$310
Individual grant recipient$302
THE LIFE CHURCH OF KANSAS CITY$202
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TITHELY: $14k → 11%Christian Life College: $305 → 12%Voice of the Martyrs: $7k → 14%Feed the Children: $1k → 16%Charitable Gift America: $500 → 6%Ascend Church: $24k → 8%First Church: $1k → 10%Hills Recovery Center: $500 → 15%Detroit Hope Center: $512 → 21%Compassion Services International: $1k → 5%THE LIFE CHURCH OF KANSAS CITY: $202 → 15%Liberty Tabernacle: $1k → 8%The Sanctuary: $49k → 13%The Sanctuary Outreach Inc: $82k → 16%Oak Park Pentecostals: $512 → 18%Restoration Farms: $2k → 11%The Water Project: $4k → 7%Blessed 2 Be Blessed Outreach: $1k → 18%Grace Christian: $1k → 11%VOICE OF THE MARTYRS: $4k → 14%ASCEND CHURCH: $17k → 8%INDIGENT INDIVIDUALS: $302 → 10%Compassion Services International: $1k → 5%WATERORG: $500 → 15%LIBERTY TABERNACLE: $669 → 8%Charitable Contributions under repo: $49k → 13%Calvary Tabernacle: $200 → 16%THE WATER PROJECT: $3k → 7%Voice of the Martyrs: $1k → 14%Ascend Church: $2k → 8%Compassion Services International: $515 → 5%Liberty Tabernacle: $515 → 8%The Sanctuary: $34k → 13%George Hurt Ministries: $500 → 16%The Water Project: $2k → 7%The Voice of the Martyrs: $500 → 14%Ascend Church: $1k → 8%COMPASSION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $310 → 5%The Sanctuary: $14k → 13%The Water Project: $523 → 7%Detroit Metro: $247 → 8%United Pentecostal Church International: $2k → 5%The Sanctuary: $4k → 13%UPCI Metro Missions: $1k → 5%Wells of Life: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
IN
CA
MO
KY
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$208k · 8 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
24

Total granted

$208k
$164k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+9%

Still filing today

38%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    The Sanctuary
    4× · 2019–2024 · $102k
  • AC
    Ascend Church
    4× · 2022–2025 · $44k
  • BA
    Benevolence Assistance to indigent
    3× · 2022–2024 · $32k

Funded once

  • TS
    The Sanctuary Outreach Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $82k
  • CC
    Charitable Contributions under repo
    one grant, 2020 · $49k
  • BA
    Benevolent Assistance to Indigent I
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Sanctuary: $102,329 · OtherThe SanctuaryThe Sanctuary Outreach Inc: $82,200 · OtherThe Sanctuary Outreach IncCharitable Contributions under repo: $49,000 · OtherCharitable Contributions under repoAscend Church: $43,868 · OtherAscend ChurchBenevolence Assistance to indigent: $31,640 · OtherBenevolence Assistance to indigentTITHELY: $14,157 · Other+23 more: $44,383 · Other+23 moreTHE WATER PROJECT INC: $9,205 · InternationalCompassion Services International: $3,061 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $1,000 · InternationalWATERORG: $500 · InternationalGeorge Hurt Ministries: $3,250 · ReligionRESTORATION FARMS NFP: $2,000 · ReligionCHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC: $500 · Education
Other$367,577International$13,766Religion$5,250Education$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC: $9,205 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGeorge Hurt Ministries: $3,250 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCompassion Services International: $3,061 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRESTORATION FARMS NFP: $2,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WATER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds George Hurt Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Compassion Services International ↗
  • Who funds RESTORATION FARMS NFP ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERORG ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fountain of Living Water Ministries funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fountain of Living Water Ministries. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fountain of Living Water Ministries?

Find your warmest path to Fountain of Living Water Ministries through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fountain of Living Water Ministries’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home