Skip to content

· Private foundation

Foundation in Memory of Dr Arvind and Mridula Acharya Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$40kPhilanthropy$11kArts & Culture$8kEnvironment$7kAnimals$4kFood & Nutrition$3kYouth Development$2kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$504
Median grant
7
States reached
$470k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Georgia Tech Foundation$6,030
United Way$5,500
World Wildlife Fund$1,735
Sea Turtle Inc$1,500
Broadway Inc$1,030
Emory University$1,000
Mary Lin Education Foundation$504
Wikimedia$500
Mary Lin Foundation$300
Smithsonian Space Museum$287
Atlanta Symphony Orchestra$230
Girl Scouts of America$216
ELCA$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Wikimedia: $500 → 10%Farm Sanctuary: $600 → 12%Broadway Inc: $1k → 17%Sea Turtle Inc: $2k → 23%Smithsonian museum: $2k → 14%United Way: $6k → 15%Girl Scouts of Greater Atlanta: $450 → 8%Atlanta Food Bank: $1k → 13%Mary Lin Education Foundation: $3k → 14%ELCA: $2k → 14%University of Illinois Foundation: $1k → 19%PETA: $400 → 19%Farm Sanctuary: $600 → 12%United Way: $6k → 15%Girl Scouts of Greater Atlanta: $450 → 8%Atlanta Food Bank: $1k → 13%Mary Lin Education Foundation: $1k → 14%U of Illinois Champaign: $500 → 19%World Wildlife Fund: $2k → 14%Girl Scouts of Greater Atlanta: $375 → 8%Atlanta Food Bank: $1k → 13%Girl Scouts of Greater Atlanta: $550 → 14%U of Illinois Champaign: $500 → 19%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2k → 14%Mary Lin Education Foundation: $504 → 14%U of Illinois Champaign: $500 → 19%World Wildlife Fund: $1k → 14%ISKON: $2k → 13%Fernbank Musuem: $350 → 14%World Wildlife Fund: $865 → 14%ISKON: $500 → 13%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $620 → 14%High Museum of Art: $2k → 13%High Museum of Art: $365 → 13%Vedanta Center of Atlanta: $1k → 14%Emory University: $2k → 14%Georgia Tech Foundation: $6k → 13%Emory University: $1k → 14%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 13%Emory University: $1k → 14%Georgia Tech: $6k → 13%Emory University: $1k → 14%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 13%Emory University: $1k → 14%Georgia Tech Foundation Inc: $500 → 13%Emory University: $500 → 14%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 13%Georgia Tech Foundation Inc: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
CA
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 19 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$68k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+74%

Still filing today

47%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $20k · revenue +11%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +47%
  • ML
    MARY LIN PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $5k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • GT
    Georgia Tech
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • SM
    Smithsonian museum
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • University of Illinois Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
5
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
6
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
7
Institute of Food Technologists

As an organization, the institute of food technologists is focusing its work in four main areas, or "roles and goals." each is wide-reaching and helps to advance our mission.steward for the profession and its community - provide learning,…

—
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
10
Wetlands America Trust Inc

Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…

Environment
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Tech Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Way: $11,000 · OtherUnited WayGeorgia Tech: $6,000 · OtherGeorgia TechEMORY UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherEMORY UNIVERSITYAtlanta Food Bank: $3,000 · OtherAtlanta Food BankISKON: $2,500 · OtherISKONSmithsonian museum: $2,052 · OtherELCA: $1,850 · OtherU of Illinois Champaign: $1,500 · Other+11 more: $6,225 · Other+11 moreGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $19,530 · EducationGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INCMARY LIN PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION: $4,707 · EducationMARY LIN PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATIONUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $1,000 · Education+2 more: $950 · EducationWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $6,660 · EnvironmentWORLD WIL…+1 more: $100 · EnvironmentROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $2,844 · Arts & CultureSEA TURTLE INC: $1,500 · Arts & CulturePEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $1,350 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC: $1,200 · AnimalsGirl Scouts of Greater Atlanta Inc: $1,825 · Youth Development
Other$40,127Education$26,187Environment$6,760Arts & Culture$4,344Animals$2,550Youth Development$1,825

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $19,530 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $6,660 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARY LIN PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION: $4,707 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $2,844 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts of Greater Atlanta Inc: $1,825 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEA TURTLE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $1,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY LIN PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Greater Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEA TURTLE INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation in Memory of Dr Arvind and Mridula Acharya Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation in Memory of Dr Arvind and Mridula Acharya Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Foundation in Memory of Dr Arvind and Mridula Acharya Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Foundation in Memory of Dr Arvind and Mridula Acharya Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foundation in Memory of Dr Arvind and Mridula Acharya’s filings →

    More from the funding graph