Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Foundation for Indigent Guardianship Inc

To request and receive grants, gifts, and bequests of moneys; to acquire, receive, hold, invest, and administer, in its own name, securities, funds, objects of value, or other property, real or personal; and to make expenditures to or for the direct or indirect benefit of the office of public and professional guardians; and as determined…

$351k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Crime & Legal$441kHuman Services$311kPublic Benefit$199kEducation$78kPhilanthropy$34kHealth$30kScience & Tech$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $265,374 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $351,161 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $85,787 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $237k
$14,711
Median grant
States reached
$351k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM OF DADE COUNTY$44,748
PATRICK C WEBER PA PUBLIC GUARDIAN$33,048
Individual grant recipient$22,186
Individual grant recipient$18,353
NORTH FLORIDA OFFICE OF PUBIC GUARDIA INC$18,219
ADVANCED DENTAL CARE$17,431
Individual grant recipient$15,964
Individual grant recipient$14,711
ST THOMAS COLLEGE OF LAW - OPG$14,509
Individual grant recipient$13,170
Individual grant recipient$12,500
FSI TRUST$11,948
NAPLES FUNERAL HOME$9,132
Individual grant recipient$8,565
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC$5,880
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$611k · 8 repeat orgs$668k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
27

Total granted

$611k
$476k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $192k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM OF DADE COUNTY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $290k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2025 · $107k
  • GP
    GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM OF ST THOMAS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW
    2× · 2023–2024 · $80k

Funded once

  • GP
    GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM OF THE COUNCIL ON AGING - VOLUSIA COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $90k
  • CA
    COLLIERCHARLOTTLEMONROEGLADES AND DESOTO COUNTY PUBLIC GUARDIAN
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • BU
    BARRY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK
    one grant, 2020 · $49k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20182025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM OF DADE COUNTY — $290,151 · OtherGUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM OF DADE COUNTYIndividual grant recipient — $107,158 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM OF THE COUNCIL ON AGING - VOLUSIA COUNTY — $90,095 · OtherGUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM OF THE COUNCIL ON AGING - VOLUSIA COUNTYGUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM OF ST THOMAS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW — $79,661 · OtherGUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM OF ST THOMAS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAWPATRICK WEBER PA PUBLIC GUARDIAN — $65,615 · OtherCOLLIERCHARLOTTLEMONROEGLADES AND DESOTO COUNTY PUBLIC GUARDIAN — $60,480 · OtherBARRY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK — $48,913 · Other+40 more — $536,998 · Other+40 more
Other$1,279,071

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Foundation for Indigent Guardianship Inc?

Find your warmest path to Foundation for Indigent Guardianship Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph