Skip to content

· Private foundation

Foundation for Arts Initiatives

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
65
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$4.9MEducation$280kHuman Services$280kCommunity Improvement$275kReligion$222kCivil Rights$160kSocial Science$150kScience & Tech$118kOther$0
02FY2024 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $143k
  • $10k–50k39 grants · $701k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $360k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LEBANESE ASSOCIATION FOR PLASTIC ARTS ASHKAL ALWAN$60,000
ANADOLU KULTUR SANAT TANITIM ILETISIM YAYIN BILGISAYAR EGITIM DANISMANLIK$50,000
LABORATORY FOR THE URBAN COMMONS$50,000
INSTITUTE OF RADICAL IMAGINATION$50,000
MUZEUM SZTUKI NOWOCZESNEJ W WASZAWIE (MUSEUM OF MODERN ART IN WARSAW)$50,000
WHAT HOW AND FOR WHOMWHW$50,000
DECOLONIZING ARCHITECTURE ART RESIDENCY$50,000
KHALIL SAKAKINI CULTURAL CENTER$35,000
FUNDACION ARTE Y SOLIDARIDAD$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
AL MA'MAL FOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART$30,000
ARAB IMAGE FOUNDATION$30,000
FUNDACION DE LOS COMUNES$30,000
ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE AKA$30,000
EUROPAISCHES INSTITUT FUR PROGRESSIVE KULTURPOLITIK (EIPCP)$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 2% of grant dollars ($138k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 98% that went abroad ($6.9M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 33% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%KHALIL SAKAKINI CULTURAL CENTER: $35k → 8%EUROPAISCHES INSTITUT FUR PROGRESSIVE KULTURPOLITIK (EIPCP): $22k → 12%SVITLANA LIBET: $8k → 17%FUNDACION ARTE Y SOLIDARIDAD: $30k → 8%LABORATORY FOR THE URBAN COMMONS: $50k → 11%LOCUS ATHENS: $8k → 13%HARMONY HOLIDAY: $8k → 14%STATE OF CONCEPT: $25k → 7%ESPACIO PARA LA INVESTIGACION Y REFLEXION ARTISTICA (ESPIRA): $25k → 13%HAGERSTENSASENS MEDBORGARHUSFORENIN: $25k → 14%DENIS VOLKOV: $8k → 17%NAEEM MOHAIEMEN: $8k → 20%GOLDIN AND SENNEBY: $25k → 8%SUBURBIA ESTUDIOS URBANOS: $20k → 18%BERMET BORUBAEVA: $8k → 23%BANU CENNETOGLU: $8k → 17%ELENA ISHCHENKO: $8k → 7%MDA DESIGN CENTRE (MALAYSIA DESIGN ARCHIVE): $25k → 12%FUNDACION CASA TRES PATIOS: $50k → 17%ASOCIATIA CULTURALA SOLITUDE PROJECT(SOLITUDE PROJECT CULTURAL ASSOCIATION): $8k → 12%ASOCIACION ARCHIVO ARKHE: $50k → 12%ASOCIACION CULTURAL TODO POR LA PRAXIS: $35k → 16%SARAH RIFKY: $8k → 22%UDRUZENJE GRADJANA KUDAORG (ASSOCIATION OF CITIZENS KUDAORG): $25k → 6%FUNDATIA IDEA: $10k → 11%CONA PROJECTS: $25k → 12%FUNDACION ARS TEORETICA: $25k → 17%FUNDACION ARTE Y SOLIDARIDAD: $30k → 8%LABORATORY FOR THE URBAN COMMONS: $50k → 11%SANTA MONICA MUSEUM OF ART DBA INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%DOA ALY: $8k → 7%PROTOCINEMA INC: $50k → 17%WORKING ARTISTS AND THE GREATER ECONOMY INC (WAGE): $20k → 20%SUBURBIA ESTUDIOS URBANOS: $20k → 18%ESPACIO DE INVESTIGACIONES FEMINISTAS: $40k → 12%UDRUZENJE GRADJANA KUDAORG (ASSOCIATION OF CITIZENS KUDAORG): $25k → 6%LABORATORY FOR THE URBAN COMMONS: $50k → 11%UCITELJ NEZNALICA I NJEGOVI KOMITETI (THE IGNORANT SCHOOLMASTER AND HIS COM: $16k → 6%TIMUR KARPOV: $8k → 17%BRIAN KUAN WOOD: $8k → 20%FUNDACION DE LOS COMUNES: $30k → 12%UDRUZENJE GRADJANA KUDAORG (ASSOCIATION OF CITIZENS KUDAORG): $25k → 6%GALA BERGER: $8k → 11%FUNDACION DE LOS COMUNES: $30k → 12%UDRUZENJE GRADJANA KUDAORG (ASSOCIATION OF CITIZENS KUDAORG): $25k → 6%ESPACIO DE INVESTIGACIONES FEMINISTAS: $30k → 12%FUNDACION DE LOS COMUNES: $20k → 12%ESPACIO DE INVESTIGACIONES FEMINISTAS: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 98% of all-years giving ($6.9M)

62 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Lebanon$888k · 47 grants
Germany$468k · 25 grants
Spain$415k · 18 grants
Turkey$413k · 26 grants
OC$365k · 16 grants
India$290k · 11 grants
Poland$290k · 16 grants
Italy$278k · 9 grants
Colombia$268k · 7 grants
Croatia$255k · 6 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 54 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

54 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
170

Total granted

$4.2M
$2.4M

Still filing today

0%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $463k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LEBANESE ASSOCIATION FOR PLASTIC ARTS ASHKAL ALWAN
    5× · 2020–2024 · $320k
  • AI
    ARAB IMAGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $230k
  • WH
    WHAT HOW AND FOR WHOMWHW
    4× · 2020–2024 · $220k

Funded once

  • YJ
    YAYASAN JAKARTA BIENNALE (JAKARTA BIENNALE FOUNDATION)
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
  • FC
    FUNDACION CASA TRES PATIOS
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • FA
    FUNDACION ARKHE ARCHIVOS DE ARTE LATINOAMERICANO
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 261 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE LEBANESE ASSOCIATION FOR PLASTIC ARTS ASHKAL ALWAN: $320,000 · OtherARAB IMAGE FOUNDATION: $230,000 · OtherWHAT HOW AND FOR WHOMWHW: $220,000 · Other+194 more: $5,756,500 · Other+194 morePROTOCINEMA INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureICA LA: $20,000 · Arts & CultureWORKING ARTISTS AND THE GREATER ECONOMY: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$6,526,500Arts & Culture$90,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROTOCINEMA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetICA LA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWORKING ARTISTS AND THE GREATER ECONOMY: $20,000 over 1y, 41% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROTOCINEMA INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Arts Initiatives funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Arts Initiatives. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Foundation for Arts Initiatives?

    Find your warmest path to Foundation for Arts Initiatives through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 261 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foundation for Arts Initiatives’ filings →

    More from the funding graph