Skip to content
Food Export USA - Northeast at a glance

· Public charity

Food Export USA - Northeast

To assist small and medium companies located in the u.s.

$7.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
134
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$423k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$30MCommunity Improvement$6.7MInternational$2.6MEnvironment$2.4MYouth Development$1.6MHealth$1.4MAnimals$1.1MArts & Culture$1.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 134 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $146k
  • $10k–50k80 grants · $2.1M
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.0M
$26,798
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL AMERICAN SUPERMARKETS CORP$423,443
KNOUSE FOOD INC$380,796
LOVEBUG NUTRITION INC$332,496
SEA BREEZE FRUIT FLAVORS INC$305,838
RASTELLI BROTHERS INC- RASTELLI FOODS$276,087
ALEXANDER MINN WINE GROUP$255,568
MEHADRIN DAIRY CORP$229,639
LIBER CHOCOLATE AND FOOD PRODUCTS DBA LIEBERS KOSHER FOOD$225,555
GLOBAL EXPORT MARKETING CO LTD$217,038
ROYAL WINE CORPORATION$215,822
DAIRY DELIGHTS LLC$169,175
REAL KOSHER ICE CREAM DBA KLEINS ICE CREAM$162,775
MAXI HEALTH$156,850
KINKIND$138,004
FOODTOWN INTERNATIONAL INC$133,735
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CANADA ENTERPRISES LLC: $369k → 10%AMERICAN TRADING INTERNATIONAL: $209k → 14%PABLO MARTINEZ - QUALIA GROUP LLC: $264k → 15%RASTELLI BROTHERS INC - GLOBAL TRADING: $514k → 8%LIEBER'S KOSHER FOOD SPECIALTIES INC DBA LIBER CHOCOLATE: $267k → 14%PABLO MARTINEZ - QUALIA GROUP LLC: $257k → 15%RASTELLI BROTHERS INC: $453k → 8%ROYAL WINE CORPORATION: $264k → 14%PABLO MARTINEZ - QUALIA GROUP LLC: $249k → 15%RASTELLI BROTHERS INC: $300k → 8%LIBER CHOCOLATE AND FOOD PRODUCTS DBA LIEBERS KOSHER FOOD: $226k → 14%LOVEBUG NUTRITION INC: $332k → 17%PABLO MARTINEZ - QUALIA GROUP LLC: $242k → 15%RASTELLI BROTHERS INC - RASTELLI FOODS: $283k → 8%ROYAL WINE CORPORATION: $216k → 14%QUALIA GROUP LLC: $231k → 15%RASTELLI BROTHERS INC- RASTELLI FOODS: $276k → 8%BASSETTS ICE CREAM COMPANY INC: $226k → 22%ALEXANDER MINN WINE GROUP: $530k → 9%LIEBER'S KOSHER FOOD SPECIALTIES INC: $234k → 13%SEA BREEZE FRUIT FLAVORS INC: $600k → 4%ALEXANDER MINN WINE GROUP: $319k → 9%SEA BREEZE FRUIT FLAVORS INC: $307k → 4%SEA BREEZE FRUIT FLAVORS INC: $306k → 4%ALEXANDER MINN WINE GROUP: $309k → 9%SEA BREEZE FRUIT FLAVORS INC: $300k → 4%SEA BREEZE FRUIT FLAVORS INC: $300k → 4%ALEXANDER MINN WINE GROUP: $256k → 9%KIND INC: $322k → 17%SEA BREEZE FRUIT FLAVORS INC: $201k → 4%KIND INC: $287k → 17%MEHADRIN DAIRY CORP: $257k → 10%KIND INC: $245k → 17%MEHADRIN DAIRY CORP: $230k → 10%A & B FAMOUS GEFILTE FISH INC: $326k → 12%INTERNATIONAL AMERICAN SUPERMARKETS CORP: $423k → 8%INTERNATIONAL AMERICAN SUPERMARKETS CORP: $413k → 8%INTERNATIONAL AMERICAN SUPERMARKETS CORP: $356k → 8%KENS FOODINC: $207k → 8%INTERNATIONAL AMERICAN SUPERMARKETS CORP: $310k → 8%INTERNATIONAL AMERICAN SUPERMARKETS CORP: $250k → 8%INTERNATIONAL AMERICAN SUPERMARKETS CORP: $244k → 8%GLOBAL EXPORT MARKETING CO LTD: $559k → 17%GLOBAL EXPORT MARKETING CO LTD: $523k → 17%GLOBAL EXPORT MARKETING CO LTD: $450k → 17%TO DOGGY WITH LOVE LLC DBA KINKIND: $313k → 17%GLOBAL EXPORT MARKETING CO LTD: $300k → 17%GLOBAL EXPORT MARKETING CO LTD: $217k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
DE
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46M · 212 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

212 repeat relationships: 113 still active in FY2024, 99 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

212
116

Total granted

$46M
$1.8M

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $415k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KF
    KNOUSE FOOD INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M
  • GE
    GLOBAL EXPORT MARKETING CO LTD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M
  • IA
    INTERNATIONAL AMERICAN SUPERMARKETS CORP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M

Funded once

  • KI
    KIND INC
    one grant, 2018 · $322k
  • AT
    AMERICAN TRADING INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2017 · $209k
  • DM
    DURKEE MOWER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $99k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 348 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KNOUSE FOOD INC: $2,418,187 · OtherGLOBAL EXPORT MARKETING CO LTD: $2,301,126 · OtherINTERNATIONAL AMERICAN SUPERMARKETS CORP: $2,279,592 · OtherSEA BREEZE FRUIT FLAVORS INC: $2,156,557 · OtherALEXANDER MINN WINE GROUP: $1,839,166 · OtherPABLO MARTINEZ - QUALIA GROUP LLC: $1,665,955 · Other+194 more: $33,675,313 · Other+194 more
Other$46,335,896

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine International T…Maine Technology Inst…
Maine International Trade CenterME16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine International Trade Center · Maine Technology Institute

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 348 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Food Export USA - Northeast’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home