Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Florida · Public charity

Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Inc

To promote the preservation and the inclusive sharing of the diverse architectural, historical and archaeological heritage of florida.

$7k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$5,000
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$5.4M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Green Gables at Historic Riverview Village Inc$5,0001n/a
Mount Olive Ame Church of Jacksonville$5,0001n/a
Putnam County Historical Society Inc$5,0001n/a
Okahumpka Community Club Incorporated$2,5001n/a
Historic Central Academy Preservation and Community Develop$1,50014%

Compare Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Inc with peer funders

About Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Inc

How much does Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Inc give?
Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Inc reported 2 grants totaling $6,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (80%), Community Improvement (20%).
Who are Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2025: Green Gables at Historic Riverview Village Inc ($5k), Mount Olive Ame Church of Jacksonville ($5k), Putnam County Historical Society Inc ($5k).
Where is Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Inc based?
Florida Trust for Historic Preservation Inc is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Florida Trust for Historic Preservation’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home