Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Florida Native Plant Society Inc

The Mission of the Florida Native Plant Society is to promote the preservation, conservation, and restoration of the native plants and native plant communities of Florida.

$15k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182023.

Environment$37kPublic Benefit$6kEducation$3kHealth$3kRecreation & Sports$3k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$554k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FL Native Plant Soc The Villages$5,000
University of Georgia Research Foun$2,500
Northwestern University$2,500
University of Florida$2,500
Miami University$1,500
Marion Big Scrub Chapter - FNPS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 48% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%FL Native Plant Soc The Villages: $5k → 9%PALM BEACH CHAPTER OF FNPS: $6k → 11%Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden: $5k → 15%Marion Big Scrub Chapter - FNPS: $1k → 16%University of Georgia Research Foun: $3k → 27%Miami University: $2k → 12%Northwestern University: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CUPLET FERN FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY — $10,000 · OtherCUPLET FERN FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETYUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA — $9,352 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAFLORIDA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY INC — $5,500 · OtherFLORIDA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY INCFLORIDA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · OtherFLORIDA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY INCMIAMI UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · Other+1 more — $1,000 · OtherPUTNAM LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $7,235 · EnvironmentPUTNAM LAND CONSERVANCY INCFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC …University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc — $2,500 · EducationNorthwestern University — $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$32,352Environment$12,235Education$2,500Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPUTNAM LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $7,235 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PUTNAM LAND CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC
  • Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Northwestern University

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Florida Native Plant Society Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Putnam Land Conservancy Inc13% of income from government
  • Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $22k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph