Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Florida Atlantic University Foundation Inc

The mission of the FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC.

$36M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$23M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$125MCommunity Improvement$95kScience & Tech$59kYouth Development$11k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $35,313,234 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $36,047,034 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $733,800 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$9,037,741
Median grant
1
States reached
$500M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY$22,619,145
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY$9,037,741
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY$3,656,348
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $29k → 8%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC: $29k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $15k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (SAN DIEGO): $33k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $29k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII: $29k → 9%OUTWARD BOUND SERVICES GROUP: $11k → 9%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $29k → 11%RICE UNIVERSITY: $29k → 16%FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $29k → 10%SOUTHPAW PRINCE INC: $10k → 11%TSIC INC DBA TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN: $49k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI-DR JAMES GALVIN: $289k → 15%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $33k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $29k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $15k → 7%GEORGIA INSTITUTE: $15k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $15k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $33k → 11%RIDGEBACK NETWORK DEFENSE INC: $25k → 11%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $15k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $15k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $15k → 14%FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $29k → 10%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $22.6M → 11%HUBSPRING HEALTH LLC: $25k → 15%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $15k → 7%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $15k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $15k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $15k → 11%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $15k → 8%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $18.6M → 11%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $15k → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $14.5M → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $10.2M → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $9.0M → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $8.5M → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $8.2M → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $7.9M → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $7.9M → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $6.6M → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $5.5M → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY: $3.7M → 11%AD HENDERSON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL: $28k → 11%VIDEOPURA LLC: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OR
RI
CA
VA
MD
NC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$124M · 9 repeat orgs$669k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
17

Total granted

$124M
$669k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+41%

Still filing today

22%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
EducationCrime & LegalScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $123M
  • FP
    FLORIDA PREPAID COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $542k
  • OS
    OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2022 · $91k

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Miamigraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $289k · revenue +66%
  • TI
    TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN
    one grant, 2022 · $49k · revenue +16%
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2022 · $33k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
9
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

12
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Institute of Technology Inc and the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY — $123,414,053 · OtherFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY+18 more — $1,042,994 · OtherUniversity of Miami — $288,953 · EducationFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $57,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $29,500 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY — $28,500 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $28,500 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $28,500 · EducationWilliam Marsh Rice University — $28,500 · EducationWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION — $59,000 · Science & TechTSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN — $48,958 · Crime & Legal
Other$124,457,047Education$489,953Science & Tech$59,000Crime & Legal$48,958

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Miami — $288,953 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION — $59,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $57,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN — $48,958 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $29,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $28,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $28,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $28,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $28,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION
  • Who funds FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
  • Who funds TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Florida Atlantic University Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution63% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Florida Institute of Technology Inc5% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph