Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
Facil facilitates collaboration among member cils and stakeholders resulting in a unified voice advocating for equal rights for people with disabilities.
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization is committed to working with individuals, families, and communities to promote independent living and individual choice to persons with disabilities.
The mission of cilscpa is to empower people with disabilities to lead independent lives in their communities.
Empowering people with disabilities to function as independently as possible and to be active, contributing members of society.
The mission is to assist people with disabilities to achieve their goals. cbcil provides core services of advocacy, independent living, peer counciling, information, and referral and transition services
To ensure that people with disabilities have complete access to the communities in which they choose to live. we provide information and referral, advocacy, peer support, independent living skills training and nursing home to community…
The center teaches and promotes independence, equality and dignity in employment, education, social opportunities, transportation and all other areas of life for individuals with disabilities.
Independent living services for persons with disabilities.
To enable people with disabilities to manage their own lives, make their own choices, and give information and knowledge to assist in living with dignity and bravado.
Progress center for independent living is a consumer controlled, community-based, cross-disability, nonresidential, private nonprofit agency that has been designed by individuals with disa biilities.
To empower people with disabilities to live with autonomy and choice.
Cdd is a non-profit organization established in 1972, committed to providing housing, education, day and employment services, community integration, and skills development to individuals with developmental and intellectual disabilities in…
Cccil promotes the independence of people with disabilities by supporting their equal and full participation in life. cccil provides advocacy, education and support to people with disabilities, their families and the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Independent Living and the most unlike its peers is Disability Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Florida Alliance for Assistive · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Every dot is one organisation FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF CENTERS FOR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Through Plinth
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: KEYS ADVOCACY CENTER INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +86% since.
US 501(c)(3); EIN 311745088 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on KEYS ADVOCACY CENTER INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to Florida Association of Centers For through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.