Skip to content
Flora Bernice Smith Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Flora Bernice Smith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$156k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$327kHuman Services$113kAnimals$105kReligion$95kHousing & Shelter$82kYouth Development$82kEducation$65kCommunity Improvement$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$16,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELMCREST CHIDLREN'S CENTER$25,000
HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATION$20,000
AURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC$18,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SYRACUSE$18,000
CENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY ANIMALS$16,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ST MARY'S OF THE LAKE$15,000
ST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$14,500
CROUSE IRVING FOUNDATION$14,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST THOMAS PREPARATORY: $20k → 14%ST MARY'S OF THE LAKE: $15k → 20%ST THOMAS PREPARATORY: $15k → 14%ST MARY'S OF THE LAKE: $15k → 20%ST THOMAS PREPARATORY: $15k → 14%ST MARY'S OF THE LAKE: $15k → 20%ST THOMAS PREPARATORY: $15k → 14%ST MARY'S OF THE LAKE: $15k → 20%ST THOMAS PREPARATORY: $15k → 14%AURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $20k → 14%AURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $19k → 14%AURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $18k → 14%AURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $18k → 14%ST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $17k → 14%ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL: $17k → 14%AURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $17k → 14%ST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $16k → 14%ST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%AURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $15k → 14%ST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%ST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATION: $26k → 14%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATION: $26k → 14%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATION: $20k → 14%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATION: $20k → 14%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATION: $16k → 14%ELMCREST CHIDLREN'S CENTER: $33k → 14%ELMCREST CHIDLREN'S CENTER: $30k → 14%ELMCREST CHIDLREN'S CENTER: $30k → 14%ELMCREST CHIDLREN'S CENTER: $26k → 14%ELMCREST CHIDLREN'S CENTER: $25k → 14%ELMCREST CHIDLREN'S CENTER: $25k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SYRACUSE: $18k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SYRACUSE: $18k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SYRACUSE: $17k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SYRACUSE: $15k → 14%CROUSE IRVING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $25k → 14%CROUSE IRVING FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%CROUSE IRVING FOUNDATION: $18k → 14%CROUSE IRVING FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%CROUSE IRVING FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%CROUSE IRVING FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%CENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY ANIMALS: $20k → 14%CENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY ANIMALS: $20k → 14%CENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY ANIMALS: $18k → 14%CENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY ANIMALS: $16k → 14%CENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY ANIMALS: $16k → 14%CENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY ANIMALS: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$916k · 9 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -88% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$916k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-88%

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ELMCREST CHIDLREN'S CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $169k
  • HO
    HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $118k
  • AO
    AURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $107k · revenue -41%

Funded once

  • CI
    CROUSE IRVING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPHS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue -88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELMCREST CHIDLREN'S CENTER: $169,000 · OtherELMCREST CHIDLREN'S CENTERHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATION: $118,175 · OtherHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ASSOCIATIONAURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $107,000 · OtherAURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INCIndividual grant recipient: $89,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCROUSE IRVING FOUNDATION: $87,500 · OtherCROUSE IRVING FOUNDATIONST MARY'S OF THE LAKE: $82,100 · OtherST MARY'S OF THE LAKEBoys and Girls Club of Syracuse: $81,965 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of SyracuseST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $77,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATION+2 more: $42,000 · OtherCENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $104,500 · AnimalsCENTRAL NEW …
Other$853,740Animals$104,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $107,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $104,500 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Syracuse: $81,965 over 5y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AURORA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Syracuse ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPHS HOSPITAL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Flora Bernice Smith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Flora Bernice Smith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Flora Bernice Smith Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Flora Bernice Smith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Flora Bernice Smith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home