Skip to content

· Private foundation

Floor Covering Education Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$214k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Employment$446kEducation$80kMembership Benefit$11kHealth$200
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $181k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$697k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$30,175
NORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL COLLEGE DISTRICT$28,800
ALIGN CENTER FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT$28,750
CFI$20,625
CHATTANOOGA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$18,750
WORLD FLOOR COVERING ASSOCIATION$16,500
THREE RIVERS COLLEGE$15,750
PEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE$11,260
GREAT FALLS COLLEGE$10,000
ALBANY TECHNICAL COLLEGE$8,100
TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF APPLIED TECHNOLOGY - DICKSON$5,000
ATLANTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE$4,938
Individual grant recipient$4,925
JEFFERSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$3,600
CERAMIC TILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,161
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GREAT FALLS COLLEGE: $15k → 14%CERAMIC TILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%HAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $30k → 17%ALIGN CENTER FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: $29k → 12%JEFFERSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 16%NATIONAL WOOD FLOORING ASSOCIATION: $999 → 11%THREE RIVERS COLLEGE: $16k → 20%NORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL COLLEGE DISTRICT: $29k → 11%TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF APPLIED TECHNOLOGY - DICKSON: $5k → 11%CHATTANOOGA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $40k → 12%WALTERS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 15%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $70k → 7%ATLANTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $5k → 13%CFI: $21k → 13%GEORGIA NORTHWEST TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $4k → 15%ALBANY TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $8k → 28%PEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $11k → 18%ADVANCED FLOORING TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 6%GREAT FALLS COLLEGE: $10k → 14%HAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $14k → 17%CHATTANOOGA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $19k → 12%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $30k → 7%ATLANTA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $2k → 13%WORLD FLOOR COVERING ASSOCIATION: $17k → 13%ALBANY TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $5k → 28%PEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 18%HAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 17%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $8k → 7%FLOOR COVERING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $200 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IA
MO
KY
VA
TN
SC
MS
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$633k · 12 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$633k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-3%

Still filing today

25%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CFI
    5× · 2021–2025 · $293k
  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $108k · revenue -6%
  • CS
    CHATTANOOGA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $59k

Funded once

  • KF
    KENTUCKIANA FLOOR COVERING EDUCATIO
    one grant, 2023 · $17k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $800
  • FC
    FLOOR COVERING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $200 · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CFI: $292,875 · OtherCFICHATTANOOGA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $58,777 · OtherCHATTANOOGA STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGEHAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $50,450 · OtherHAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGENORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL COLLEGE DISTRICT: $28,800 · OtherGREAT FALLS COLLEGE: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $19,625 · Other+12 more: $103,552 · Other+12 moreGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $107,500 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF …ALIGN CENTER FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT INC: $28,750 · EmploymentALIGN CENTER FOR WORKFO…CERAMIC TILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $19,186 · EmploymentCERAMIC TILE EDUCATION …WORLD FLOOR COVERING ASSOCIATION: $16,500 · Community Improvement
Other$579,079Employment$155,436Community Improvement$16,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $107,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALIGN CENTER FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT INC: $28,750 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCERAMIC TILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $19,186 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL WOOD FLOORING ASSOCIATION: $11,663 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFLOOR COVERING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALIGN CENTER FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds CERAMIC TILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD FLOOR COVERING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOOD FLOORING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FLOOR COVERING INDUSTRY FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Floor Covering Education Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Floor Covering Education Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Floor Covering Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph